MossRoad
Super Moderator
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2001
- Messages
- 58,347
- Location
- South Bend, Indiana (near)
- Tractor
- Power Trac PT425 2001 Model Year
While I don't have much sympathy for the dead burglar, and I can understand the possible frustration of the property owner per the reports of multiple past break-ins, you can't just set traps for humans hoping to kill the correct one over a principle.
According to the article:
Goetten (the special prosecutor) pointed to multiple interviews played during the state's case, in which Wasmund (the man found guilty) told authorities there was nothing worth anyone's life in there. He told investigators that he wouldn't have shot a complete stranger over that crap. (bold underline by me)
source: Chester man convicted in booby-trap murder | Crime/Courts | thesouthern.com
Yet apparently the jury thinks he would and did. Over what? If not "that crap", then what? He got frustrated, and set out to intentionally kill the person or persons responsible. He thought about it before he did it. It wasn't spur of the moment, fight or flight, self defense. It was well thought out over time. He made a bad decision and now has to pay for it, as did the burglar.
"First-degree murder is the most serious of all homicide offenses. It involves any intentional murder that is willful and premeditated with malice aforethought. Premeditation requires that the defendant planned the murder before it was committed or was lying in wait for the victim. "
source: First-Degree Murder Law | Justia
The facts presented in the article seem to fit the definition of first-degree murder.
According to the article:
Goetten (the special prosecutor) pointed to multiple interviews played during the state's case, in which Wasmund (the man found guilty) told authorities there was nothing worth anyone's life in there. He told investigators that he wouldn't have shot a complete stranger over that crap. (bold underline by me)
source: Chester man convicted in booby-trap murder | Crime/Courts | thesouthern.com
Yet apparently the jury thinks he would and did. Over what? If not "that crap", then what? He got frustrated, and set out to intentionally kill the person or persons responsible. He thought about it before he did it. It wasn't spur of the moment, fight or flight, self defense. It was well thought out over time. He made a bad decision and now has to pay for it, as did the burglar.
"First-degree murder is the most serious of all homicide offenses. It involves any intentional murder that is willful and premeditated with malice aforethought. Premeditation requires that the defendant planned the murder before it was committed or was lying in wait for the victim. "
source: First-Degree Murder Law | Justia
The facts presented in the article seem to fit the definition of first-degree murder.