First, there's no guarantee that the processor will process 1.25 cords per hour. It's just a machine. It's totally dependent on all circumstances surrounding the operation. So you cannot quote expected production. Too many variables to do that.
By your information if the processor does meet your expectations you can't keep up stacking the wood. So, there's the first hinderance to the processor's production.
We have options that have already been considered as I saw stacking as the bottleneck. The first is having my neighbor help stack and we would help him when he uses the processor to do his wood. The other option is to let the processor mound the splits into huge piles, and stack them into totes from the pile. We need to do some of that anyway as I only have enough totes to hold 15-16 cords of wood.
You are indicating that all you have to do is run the tractor to meet these production goals? Who's doing the stacking?
I can hire it out as in my post for $15/hr or do it myself
I have never said I can heat for less cost. I have always said wood heat is not efficient.
Sir, you defintiely have said wood heat is not finacially vialbe
Let's say you are my neighbor. Let's say I stop by and talk to you about processing wood for me. Let's say I ask you what you would charge me to process a cord of wood. Standing tree to split pile. What would be your response?
I am not dealing with standing trees. I am purchasing logs and processing them. Felling trees, delimbing them, dragging them out and buckiing them is too much work for me. I pay a premium for logs ready to process and still save money. Sorry if I did not make that clear.
That figure has to be added into the equation of what it costs me to burn wood. If that's included, my heating costs will be very, very competitive to burning wood.
Still no numbers on your costs?
The wood burners always say "but I enjoy doing it and it's good exercise". Agreed. I'm not talking about that, I'm talking about how much you would charge me to process a cord of wood?
That cost figure is never, ever included in the wood burner's cost figures.
I'm not condemning burning wood. I did it for 40 years. I'm simply trying to put it all into perspective.....