You guys are all talking about rear weight. The operator's manual for that tractor says to use FRONT WEIGHTS with the 305 loader.
You might want to read this.
OMLVU28456
It's the 3032E, and 3038E Compact Utility Tractors Operator's Manual (NA, January 2014).
This is the Ballasting Machine section from the 3032E, and 3038E Compact Utility Tractors Operator's Manual (NA, January 2014).
Ballasting Machine section
It says with the 305 loader, to use implement code 52.
Implement code 52 says to use 9 (nine) 72 pound weights
ON THE FRONT OF THE MACHINE.
If the operator's manual says to use nine 72 pound weights on the front of the machine, and there were NO weights on the front of the machine (the lawsuit says the machine wasn't ballasted from the dealer), and the owner put a box blade on the back, that would actually MAKE THE TRACTOR MORE UNSTABLE, as it would take even more weight off of the front end.
Read that entire ballasting page. It specifically says to use front weights with that loader. Then it also talks about rear wheel weights, fluid in the tires, ballast boxes on the rear hitch, etc...
When you start reading it, read it again a few times. You'll be totally confused as to what the proper way to ballast the machine actually is. Given this, I'm kinda surprised we haven't seen lawsuits on this issue before.
I'm not taking sides in either case. But the school of thought here on TBN (and expressed many times in just this thread) is that if you have an FEL on a tractor you should ballast the rear, but according to the ballasting section of this tractor's operator's manual, you should ballast the front.
Enjoy the read and have a sleepless night. :ashamed: