Corona Virus #6

[Sigarms]

Will say this, has been an interesting time for the HVAC industry.

Lot of suppliers are going to a "no contact" sale to the contractor. Contractors are limiting the people allowed into their building as well.

I was doing a training class at the end of next month, sent off an e-mail today cancelling the class.

 

[5030]

Yeah, what you're missing is that people with the virus should isolate themselves from those without. If you're "just ill", then you can still do the normal stuff with some precautions like you'd take with a cold. If you have COVID-19, then you REALLY should be fully quarantined so you don't give it to me.

Yep, and in my case, I know exactly who I might be in contact with (though I do practice and always have practiced social distancing, only person I'm 'huggy' with is my wife. If I contracted it (I have not yet), I'd pretty much know who I got it from and lets just say at this juncture, that person wouldn't be worth a plug nickle. Life is good here (minus the lack of a supply of TP), nothing has changed and I don't anticipate it to but then I don't live in an urban area, living in a remote area has it's advantages, especially today. Distinct advantages.

 

[locknut]

Anyone here have their Hydroxychloroquine/Zinc ready in case you get this virus?

 

[DarkBlack]

Pretty decent article that is a bit less doom and gloom...

Amazing how we can all manipulate data to show whatever trend or statistic we would like to push our own agenda!


Evidence over hysteria COVID-19 - Six Four Six Nine - Medium

Evidence over hysteria COVID-19 - Six Four Six Nine - Medium

.
That is the first reasonable article I have read.
Every other publication has a blatant worse case bias in the writing.

 

[Jstpssng]

Maybe I'll clarify my original post. I understand and agree with testing for the reasons you describe, but just like a survey, you test a representative sample to understand the bigger picture. It doesn't require the testing of every possible patient. It's getting played up that because there aren't enough test kits for every possible patient, it's somehow some epic failure to the outbreak response.

They aren't looking for a representative sample. They are testing to see if you have the virus. If you do, they will (hopefully) try to treat it, while also ensuring that you do whatever it takes to keep from spreading the virus.

 

[k0ua]

Day 3 of sore throat. Still here!

yep, same here. sore throat, and a little more "drainage". Still no lung involvement. And I don't feel too bad.

 

[rswyan]

yep, same here. sore throat, and a little more "drainage". Still no lung involvement. And I don't feel too bad.

Good to hear ... :thumbsup:

 

[txdon]

Excellent post Bnold!
Evidence over hysteria — COVID-19 - Six Four Six Nine - Medium


"So what should we do?
The first rule of medicine is to do no harm.
Local governments and politicians are inflicting massive harm and disruption with little evidence to support their draconian edicts. Every local government is in a mimetic race to one-up each other in authoritarian city ordinances to show us who has more “abundance of caution”. Politicians are competing, not on more evidence or more COVID-19 cures but more caution. As unemployment rises and families feel unbearably burdened already, they feel pressure to “fix” the situation they created with even more radical and “creative” policy solutions. This only creates more problems and an even larger snowball effect. The first place to start is to stop killing the patient and focus on what works.
Start with basic hygiene
The most effective means to reduce spread is basic hygiene. Most American’s don’t wash their hands enough and aren’t aware of how to actually wash your hands. Masks aren’t particularly effective if you touch your eyes with infected hands. Ask businesses and public places to freely distribute disinfectant wipes and hand sanitizer to the customers and patrons. If you get sick or feel sick, stay home. These are basic rules for preventing illness that doesn’t require trillions of dollars.
More data
The best examples of defeating COVID-19 requires lots of data. We are very behind in measuring our population and the impact of the virus but this has turned a corner the last few days. The swift change in direction should be applauded. Private companies are quickly developing and deploying tests, much faster than CDC could ever imagine. The inclusion of private businesses in developing solutions is creative and admirable. Data will calm nerves and allow us to utilize more evidence in our strategy. Once we have proper measurement implemented (the ability to test hundreds every day in a given metro), let’s add even more data into that funnel — reopen public life.
Open schools
Closing schools is counterproductive. The economic cost for closing schools in the U.S. for four weeks could cost between $10 and $47 billion dollars (0.1–0.3% of GDP) and lead to a reduction of 6% to 19% in key health care personnel."

 

[/pine]

.
That is the first reasonable article I have read.
Every other publication has a blatant worse case bias in the writing.

Saying there is panic and hysteria like a mantra does not make it so...again...using incomplete numbers is ludicrous and will continue to be...

 

[ruffdog]

Maybe I'll clarify my original post. I understand and agree with testing for the reasons you describe, but just like a survey, you test a representative sample to understand the bigger picture. It doesn't require the testing of every possible patient. It's getting played up that because there aren't enough test kits for every possible patient, it's somehow some epic failure to the outbreak response.

There is a great NEED to test 100% of the people in certain circumstances. Here is one of those...a plane lands in Atlanta with possible infected people and there are limited test kits. Do you only test the sick ones and allow all the others to fly to other destinations? When do you get serious about controlling the spread of COVID?

Americans Aboard Costa Luminosa Land in Atlanta - The New York Times