DieselBound
Elite Member
Turbos, and associated equipment, are really small on CUTs (and I thought the turbo on my 1.9L TDI was small; the one on my NX is like a little toy!) and wouldn't likely tip any scale to any significant degree, so weight isn't likely going to show any difference.In my original question I meant that, if you look at the sales literature or data sheet, there are many numbers to describe engine, frame, hydraulics, PTO, transmission, and on and on, arranged in a neat table. And if you look across models, every single number is exactly the same, except for the horsepower. They report weight to the pound, for example. If the higher horsepower tractor had an added turbocharger, there would have been more pounds. Unless of course the numbers are wrong, in which case there's no way to compare specs.
The idea that a higher horsepower model would consume more fuel is something I didn't think about, and it's an excellent point! Except that if the 40, 50, and 60 horsepower models all consumed the same fuel when actually delivering 25 horsepower, then it doesn't matter. I don't know if this is the case.
I wouldn't assume that fuel efficiency across the suite of engines is necessarily the same. In order to achieve higher HP ratings it's quite possible that a given power range's efficiency could be lower than a lower HP tuned engine. You'd have to look at the fuel mapping tables to see what's going on. That said, I doubt that there's going to be any significant difference in fuel efficiency (there most likely is SOME difference, but it's likely small), in which case going with a higher HP rating will come down to whether one can pony up the additional money for purchase.