"Recent studies revealed your odds of ending up
with more lifetime Social Security income are higher if you delay claiming. Specifically, just 6.5% of people who start getting checks before turning 64 end up with more lifetime benefits, while 57% of people who delay until 70 find themselves with more total benefits.
There's a simple reason you have better odds of ending up with more money if you wait. Social Security was designed to equalize out lifetime benefits regardless of claiming age, with early filers getting more small checks and late filers getting fewer large ones. But the formula of early filing penalties and late retirement credits was based on life expectancy at the time of the program's design, and it hasn't changed despite life expectancies getting longer since then.
As a result, more people than in the past end up living long enough to get so many higher checks, their lifetime benefits more than make up for income they passed up by putting off receiving them until age 70."
Moving the Max realized benefits odds from 6.5% to 57% on average does financially appeal to some. There's no game bring played. Some don't have 35 years of earnings by full retirement age so working to 70 can boost monthly SS deposits. Then there can be income tax considerations due to retiring before 70. Different people need different opinions.
Being a special snowflake my annual SS is $18K more by signing up at 70 vs 62. In our case since the wife had hit her FRA when I signed up she can draw off of me until she turns 70 next year and starts drawing off her account. I have to live to 75 to be in the black vs signing up at 62.
At 62 the math showed me to make a run for 70. I had a friend with health risks who signed up at 62 and lived another 3 years.
When it comes to Social Security staying alive has more impact on how much one draws than anything else.