Interesting video, but we all know specs (and videos like that) can be made to say whatever you want.
First, the guy narrating the video got it wrong. THe FIRST thing they tested was NOT breakout force. Just lifting force (I believe).
Deere rates the 10x lift capacity only 80lbs more than the BX, and rollback force is rated 250lbs more. So I wonder why the video shows such a larger difference.
Maybe deere underrated theirs more?????? Heck, even the BX #'s are better than kubota claims.
Not saying it isnt a strong loader, and I am not trying to dispute the video, but heck, my much larger kubota
L3400 is only rated @ 860lbs at the bucket edge (where they tested it). As it is now, unless I have the 1100lb 6' bushhog on, I cant keep the loaded R1's on the ground. So even If I had a stronger loader, it wouldnt do me much good.
And I think the same is going to be true of the 10-series and BX. I am not sure how they tested that, or if they had the rear end chained down as to not topple over the edge, but what they "sould" do is a "real world test" like how most will use their tractors. For example, a Boxblade is a common form of
ballast. So take the two tractors, put the same boxblade on them, and repete the test. I have my doubts that the deere will get 1000lbs before the rear end lifts.