200x vs. 200cx vs .........

[bkennedy]

There seems to have been some debate on the differences between the 210, 200x 200cx, 410, loaders. No question the 200x and 200cx have greater rated capacity than the 210. The 200x is more of a permanent mount then the 200cx, which has a quick removal and attachment system. Are there other differences between these that people are sure off, especially the 200x vs. 200cx??

 

[bigpete]

I will be interested to read reports on the 200cx on both the 2210 and 4X1X tractors. It's just a curiosity, though, becasue I have a 410 on my 4110 and don't anticipate needing to change for many, many years.

My curiosity surrounds the real differences in performance of the same loader on different machines with different hydraulic flow rates and PSI ratings. JD claims the same capacity for the 200 loaders on all machines, but I wonder how that will play out. Having owned a 2210 with 210 loader, and now its big brother, I will say, without a doubt, that the 410 loader on the 4110 outperforms the 210 loader on the 2210 by a big margin. The specs were clearly different, too. The added weight and hydraulic flow/PSI on the 4110 makes for the difference, I believe. The 210 loader and the 410 loader appeared to be basically the same construction quality and material. I haven't looked, but I wonder if the 200cx loader is a step down in capacity from the 410.

Anyone...? Anyone...? /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif