pharmvet
Platinum Member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2008
- Messages
- 533
- Location
- North East TX
- Tractor
- Ford 7710 II FWA, NH TB110 FWA w/ NH 46LB loader, JD 5303 2wd w/ loader
I am reworking a heavy duty 3 pt. 10' disk. Currently, the lift arms attach in the classic method whereby there is a stud bolted through a metal ear.
This stud then slides into the category II eyeball on the end of my lift arm. As you can see, this "ear" has been bent in the past. Im considering re-fabricating the attachment so that there are 2 "ears" that the eyeball goes between and then utilize a pin (like most attachments have where the top link attaches). I think this will be a much more sturdy attachment method. I have a newer heavy duty bush hog that uses this method.
1) What is your opinion of the change?
2) What distance between "ears" would you recommend for a category II setup?


This stud then slides into the category II eyeball on the end of my lift arm. As you can see, this "ear" has been bent in the past. Im considering re-fabricating the attachment so that there are 2 "ears" that the eyeball goes between and then utilize a pin (like most attachments have where the top link attaches). I think this will be a much more sturdy attachment method. I have a newer heavy duty bush hog that uses this method.
1) What is your opinion of the change?
2) What distance between "ears" would you recommend for a category II setup?