4400 with LX6 or SE6?

   / 4400 with LX6 or SE6? #1  

CTS

New member
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
24
Location
Topeka, KS
Tractor
JD 4400
Is anyone pulling a LX6 or a Rhino SE6 with a 4400? If so, will these tractors handle a cutter like this without a loader for front ballast? I am looking for a newer cutter, but I prefer to mow without the loader on.

TIA for any help,
Mike.
 
   / 4400 with LX6 or SE6?
  • Thread Starter
#2  
OK... Let me broaden the question and ask if any one with a 4300, 4400, 4310, or a 4410(or any other similar sized tractor), is pulling one of these mowers without a loader on?
 
   / 4400 with LX6 or SE6? #3  
lemme answer the question you didn't ask. I looked at both of these lightweight cutters. I even demo'd an LX6.

You can do it. But front weight still will help. You don't have to use a loader. Loading the front tires, using wheel weights, suitcase weights or fabricateing front weights of your own would help a lot.

Filling the front tires can be almost free, and may not significantly add to compaction.

Free weights (weight lifting barbell weights) can be used if you can find or make a bracket.

To me these light cutters are too light. They are too easily damaged. I would probably look at a heavier 5' cutter first. YMMV!

As you probably are already aware, I pull an MX6 with my 4310, but of course, the loader stays on!
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2013 Vermeer V800 T/A Towable Vacuum Trailer (A50324)
2013 Vermeer V800...
2010 Ford Edge SE SUV (A51694)
2010 Ford Edge SE...
Deutz BF12L413F 19.1L V12 Turbo Diesel Generator (A51691)
Deutz BF12L413F...
2006 GAYLEAN  130BBL (A52472)
2006 GAYLEAN...
2009 INTERNATIONAL PRO STAR (A52472)
2009 INTERNATIONAL...
John Deere 310K Backhoe (A51573)
John Deere 310K...
 
Top