wirlybird
Gold Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2021
- Messages
- 459
- Location
- Oklahoma
- Tractor
- John Deere 3038 E, John Deere 3032E, John Deere 756, John Deere X585, John Deere 332
So the first real outing with the EFGC 155 was a bit disappointing. Running at a cut height of 3 inches.
Pretty flat 2 acre lot with a variety of weeds, grasses and small saplings.
I didn't get good before and after shots. Should have but here is one shot that gives a general idea of the vegetation. Most of it was 6-8 inches but there were shorter and taller areas.
Some of the thick grassier areas it did ok but areas with saplings, 1/4 to 1 inch, it did bad. Most of the saplings and other hard stalk plants just laid over, then they just stood back up, and were barely touched.
Took 2-3 passes over them at a snail's pace to get them cut.
My rotary cutter would have done a far superior job on this area.
Low, thick grasses, low vines and brush it may do ok on but you have to go slow and I mean SLOW!
Any hard stalk plants and saplings forget it unless you make multiple passes. The flail just pushes them over and the blades just ride right over them scuffing the top surfaces.
I ran the original belts, properly adjusted, and they held up.
Oil did work its way out the oil fill/breather. I think their instructions for filling gear case oil my over fill it some. I'll keep an eye on the oil level and see if it eventually stops coming out the breather.
After some time the whole unit really set up a loud vibration. A quick check underneath shows some blades are pretty beaten up. I need to get a better look for broken blades which I suspect I will find.
One issue with this cutter is that the hammers could be poorly designed and of poor quality.
I am going to try and see what is out there for quality hammers that may fit and see what the cost is.
They bill this unit as a "heavy duty" fail. For what people will likely use it for I would say it is medium duty at best.
I normally would have used the rotary cutter here but wanted to see what the flail would do and this area had a variety of vegetation.
My feeling at this time is I am underwhelmed with its performance. We'll see how it progresses.
Pretty flat 2 acre lot with a variety of weeds, grasses and small saplings.
I didn't get good before and after shots. Should have but here is one shot that gives a general idea of the vegetation. Most of it was 6-8 inches but there were shorter and taller areas.
Some of the thick grassier areas it did ok but areas with saplings, 1/4 to 1 inch, it did bad. Most of the saplings and other hard stalk plants just laid over, then they just stood back up, and were barely touched.
Took 2-3 passes over them at a snail's pace to get them cut.
My rotary cutter would have done a far superior job on this area.
Low, thick grasses, low vines and brush it may do ok on but you have to go slow and I mean SLOW!
Any hard stalk plants and saplings forget it unless you make multiple passes. The flail just pushes them over and the blades just ride right over them scuffing the top surfaces.
I ran the original belts, properly adjusted, and they held up.
Oil did work its way out the oil fill/breather. I think their instructions for filling gear case oil my over fill it some. I'll keep an eye on the oil level and see if it eventually stops coming out the breather.
After some time the whole unit really set up a loud vibration. A quick check underneath shows some blades are pretty beaten up. I need to get a better look for broken blades which I suspect I will find.
One issue with this cutter is that the hammers could be poorly designed and of poor quality.
I am going to try and see what is out there for quality hammers that may fit and see what the cost is.
They bill this unit as a "heavy duty" fail. For what people will likely use it for I would say it is medium duty at best.
I normally would have used the rotary cutter here but wanted to see what the flail would do and this area had a variety of vegetation.
My feeling at this time is I am underwhelmed with its performance. We'll see how it progresses.