Hi guys,
Thought there would be some previous posts about this CZ model (and variants), but forum searches only turned up TN 75 tractor topics!
Anyway, wife had her Beretta 92FS 9mm stolen, so we went to replace it today and she REALLY liked the ergonomics of the CZ. I had always thought of CZ as slightly inferior to Beretta, but the CZ seemed very well-made. Sales guy at LGS said it is now the standard-issue for NATO, and that the design and operational history over a long period have proven to be very durable. She can get by fine with the 14+1 capacity vs the larger and heavier 92FS w/17+1 or even the slightly smaller Beretta 92 compact with 13+1.
I am still in confused mode regarding the 75D, 75D PCR, 75D PO1, 75BD variants. Most comments I have seen so far about the variants, folks seem to like the PCR the best. She does NOT have any particular need for a rail, but does like having a de-cocker like the old 92FS.
Opinions from actual users?
- Jay
Thought there would be some previous posts about this CZ model (and variants), but forum searches only turned up TN 75 tractor topics!
Anyway, wife had her Beretta 92FS 9mm stolen, so we went to replace it today and she REALLY liked the ergonomics of the CZ. I had always thought of CZ as slightly inferior to Beretta, but the CZ seemed very well-made. Sales guy at LGS said it is now the standard-issue for NATO, and that the design and operational history over a long period have proven to be very durable. She can get by fine with the 14+1 capacity vs the larger and heavier 92FS w/17+1 or even the slightly smaller Beretta 92 compact with 13+1.
I am still in confused mode regarding the 75D, 75D PCR, 75D PO1, 75BD variants. Most comments I have seen so far about the variants, folks seem to like the PCR the best. She does NOT have any particular need for a rail, but does like having a de-cocker like the old 92FS.
Opinions from actual users?
- Jay