Digital pictures vs. prints

   / Digital pictures vs. prints #1  

JDgreen227

Super Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2003
Messages
6,891
Location
Central Michigan
Tractor
4210 MFWD Ehydro--'89 JD 318
For the past hour I have been printing off 4X6 vacation pictures to give to my in laws, who have zero interest in digipics, as they have no digicam or computer. I probably have close to 3500 images stored on the laptop I am using, and half that many on my Blackberry alone. Yet over the past two years, I have probably printed off less than 200 photos total, half of which I have given away to my in laws, meaning I have printed off 100 out of 3500 to actually put into an album for myself.

I am curious as to what percentage of their digipics the rest of the members here actually print off, and what is your preferred method? Going to a store and using their machines and your memory card? Using a conventional multifunction printer? Or using a dedicated photo printer such as an Epson Picturemate, which is how I make the majority of my prints?
 
   / Digital pictures vs. prints #2  
Send them over the net to walgreens and pick them up later. Wife does it when she has a coupon and it's cheap. Does it a lot for giving pictures to the grandparents. We take all of our pictures with the iPhones anymore.
 
   / Digital pictures vs. prints #3  
Most newer flat-screen TVs have a USB port. We download onto a USB thumbdrive and take it with us. I've used the port at my inlaw's and my daughter's house with great success; no computer required. My wife prints a few pictures to send to people, but most all of our family do not require prints and we don't do them for ourselves unless we want a photo to put into a frame. So our solution is to simply not do prints.
 
   / Digital pictures vs. prints #4  
We print very few photos. When we do I send them to a professional lab in Richmond, VA. If I upload the images on the weekend and the order is just prints, the prints will be at our house on Tuesday.

I have used Walmart as well. Print quality depends greatly on the print operator and maintenance of the printer. Walmart is nice because I can upload the photos to a given store for relatives to pick up. I have done this twice when my mother was traveling and wanted to see the photos. We just figured out where she would be the next day, found the nearest Walmart, and had them printed at that store. Very nice. Very convenient. :D

I think most images today are shown on smartphone, computers, TVs, Facebook, TBN. :D

For XMAS I bought my parents a Sony 10 inch digital photo frame. I meant to buy one for me to take to work but I waited too long and the prices went up. :eek: Anywho, the photo frame can holds a huge number of images and cycles through them which is very nice.

We bought a BD player two XMASes back and I made sure I bought one with a USB port on the front. There are now USB thumb drives that are small and made to fit almost flush with equipment. I put a bunch of the kids photos on the thumb drive and it sits in the BD player. The BD player will rotate through the photos just like the Sony digital photo frame but the Sony is only 10 inches while the TV is 65 inches. It makes a slightly larger impact. :laughing:

Later,
Dan
 
   / Digital pictures vs. prints #5  
We rarely print as my mother is the only one without a computer. We bought her the digital frame, but she still likes prints. Some we print off and some are done commercially.
 
   / Digital pictures vs. prints #6  
I almost never print digital pics any more.

I either email them to the recipient(s), post them on a webpage & send the recipient the link to them ... or post them on a forum :D

In my world actual prints are only useful any more for people with no computer (usually very young or old people) or to hang on the wall or the fridge.
 
   / Digital pictures vs. prints #7  
I cannot remember the last time we printed a pix.. For all the reasons given above. With all the computers we have and the usb ports on TV's now..

James K0UA
 
   / Digital pictures vs. prints
  • Thread Starter
#8  
I cannot remember the last time we printed a pix.. For all the reasons given above. With all the computers we have and the usb ports on TV's now..

James K0UA

I have had a 50 inch Panasonic plasma for five years now but have never even bothered to display photos on it, although it is capable of doing that. Makes me wonder how the image I just took on my 2.4 inch screen handheld would appear on 50 inches...:laughing:
 
   / Digital pictures vs. prints #9  
JD, we also have a 50 or 52" " Plasma and digital photos look great on it, I have used the SD slot for my game camera pics and those also look good, not as good as ones taken with a good camera though.

I'm like most of you guy's, digital unless I really want "one for the wall"
 
   / Digital pictures vs. prints #10  
We still print/enlarge for framing, but it is very selective. Otherwise, we show stuff on the PC or TV/DVD. Especially sine we have a couple mobile/laptop pc's.

We are also much more discerning about what we have in our "slide shows" too. A photo class we took some years back, really taught us to sort thru pictures, and pick out the really good ones. We still keep the others(unless out of focus etc). But, dont display them so much.

The other thing we learned, was to minimize mixing pictures that are portrait layout vs landscape, ie vertical orientation vs horizontal. Mixing them together is very distracting.

Also, limit the number of photo's in a "slide show". If you are getting up to 90 or 100, you are losing your audience...
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

377059 (A51572)
377059 (A51572)
2013 Ram 4500 Versalift Bucket Truck (A50323)
2013 Ram 4500...
2014 Ford Taurus AWD Sedan (A50324)
2014 Ford Taurus...
2008 INTERNATIONAL MA025 REEFER BOX TRUCK (A52577)
2008 INTERNATIONAL...
2013 BMW 528i Sedan (A50324)
2013 BMW 528i...
2013 Vermeer V800 T/A Towable Vacuum Trailer (A50324)
2013 Vermeer V800...
 
Top