Thanks Mark.
I might start a post on CBN so folks can follow my travails and offer tidbits of knowledge and wisdom!
I'm fairly confused at the moment. Mainly because of the number of options combined with the limits of the parcel combined with some of the design characteristics we are married to (eg., radiant heat). So I dropped this on my architect and said 'I give.'
The architect is specialized in alternative construction methods, but she outsources the energy work to specialists. I told her yesterday that I would like an early session with the energy person to get an idea of capabilities.
Because of our mild climate here in California, there are many technologies that are not well represented. It's just easier to slap central air/heat into a structure that looks like 1000 other structures in your tract, and has the minimal amount of insulation needed to satisfy regulations. (Or at least this is the way it is in central/southern CA.) It's not as easy to find hvac professionals that are well versed in boilers, radiant heat, geothermal, etc. Solar, of course, is another story. Plenty of those folks around.
As long as I am paying to have someone educate me on all of this, it might be nice to share that with the group as well. And I know it would help for others to kick the tires too!
Regardless of the efficiences that are associated with various mechanicals, my take at this moment is that passive design techniques and conservation methods are the best ways to reduce costs. I could build a 24x7 fully-lit gambling casino, and power it fully with huge solar arrays. Or I could probably build something smaller, with plenty of natural light, that heats and cools within a reasonalbe range all year round, and ... etc.
Happy new year,
Martin