Richard
Super Member
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2000
- Messages
- 5,029
- Location
- Knoxville, TN
- Tractor
- International 1066 Full sized JCB Loader/Backhoe and a John Deere 430 to mow with
Finally starting to happen. I've always had laser eyesight, even to the point that my wife told me I can see better without glasses than she can WITH hers.
I guess at 49, that is starting to change
Went to eyedoctor and long story short.... suggests I go to Walmart or similar and buy some $7.00 .75 or maybe 1.00 reading glasses. He said I have a slight astigmatism and my far vision is fine where I don't really NEED to have any glasses but... I might gain by using them. He handed me a prescription and basically said it was up to me if I wanted to deal with correcting my far sight. He also went on to say that with my mix of sight, (something about the astigmatism I think) I could see similar to someone else at my age with glasses.
I don't know.
Anyways.... he said if I wanted to not deal with reading glasses AND correcting for far distances, I could get bifocals.
Hmm... I always associated bifocals with the second stage of losing ones sight
I would have never thought someone might go from needing zero glasses to bifocals!!
I now have a pair of cheapo reading glasses and indeed, they bring back the laser sight I now recognize as having dwindled away over time.
I'm debating on filling the prescription and here's the logic of my question.
I don't think I'd want to fiddle with reading glasses AND distance glasses seperately, so I'm wondering about his wisdom of bifocals.
I know you can get bifocals with or without "the line"
My question is to people who might wear bifocals. It would seem to me that if I got bifocals WITH 'the line', then I would have two distinct areas of focus through the lens. They would be clearly differentiated by this line.
If however, I got a lens that had the invisible line, my suspicion is, the area where the line exists might not necessarily be focused for reading and it might not be focused for distance.... it might be more of a blend of the two for the transition.
I'm wondering from a vision stand point, do you find the bifocals with the line to be more efficient at what they do (good reading, changed over to good distance) or do you find the versions with the invisible line more efficient?
I'm less concerned about how they look to others while on my face, I'm more concerned about this line of transitioin possibly being a nusiance to me.
I guess at 49, that is starting to change
Went to eyedoctor and long story short.... suggests I go to Walmart or similar and buy some $7.00 .75 or maybe 1.00 reading glasses. He said I have a slight astigmatism and my far vision is fine where I don't really NEED to have any glasses but... I might gain by using them. He handed me a prescription and basically said it was up to me if I wanted to deal with correcting my far sight. He also went on to say that with my mix of sight, (something about the astigmatism I think) I could see similar to someone else at my age with glasses.
I don't know.
Anyways.... he said if I wanted to not deal with reading glasses AND correcting for far distances, I could get bifocals.
Hmm... I always associated bifocals with the second stage of losing ones sight
I now have a pair of cheapo reading glasses and indeed, they bring back the laser sight I now recognize as having dwindled away over time.
I'm debating on filling the prescription and here's the logic of my question.
I don't think I'd want to fiddle with reading glasses AND distance glasses seperately, so I'm wondering about his wisdom of bifocals.
I know you can get bifocals with or without "the line"
My question is to people who might wear bifocals. It would seem to me that if I got bifocals WITH 'the line', then I would have two distinct areas of focus through the lens. They would be clearly differentiated by this line.
If however, I got a lens that had the invisible line, my suspicion is, the area where the line exists might not necessarily be focused for reading and it might not be focused for distance.... it might be more of a blend of the two for the transition.
I'm wondering from a vision stand point, do you find the bifocals with the line to be more efficient at what they do (good reading, changed over to good distance) or do you find the versions with the invisible line more efficient?
I'm less concerned about how they look to others while on my face, I'm more concerned about this line of transitioin possibly being a nusiance to me.