jlgurr
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,024
- Location
- Bostic, NC
- Tractor
- Massey Ferguson GC1705, John Deere STX46
First would like to say that I appreciate the experience and insight learned from all of you in the past year or so regarding many things, not just tractors. Because of your broad backgrounds and the camaraderie here I want to post a scenario and get your opinions. There's no right or wrong answer, just looking for pros and cons, and even your 'f��eelings' as this may really become more of gut feel than a justifiable decision.
My great-great-grandfather was the first private owner of 40 acres in a northern state some 150 years ago. It's been in the family ever since but the current owner (my uncle) has no male descendants. He's curious if I would be interested in keeping it in the family. Of course, my first instinctive response was HECK YES! All of my childhood and up through my teen years we would vacation on this property and there are many fond memories. Being an avid genealogical researcher of my family heritage this seemed to be an opportunity of a lifetime, I think. You see things are never quite that simple are they?
My predicament comes in that after college I moved several times with my employer and have finally settled in North Carolina 700 miles from home and nearly 900 miles from the 40 acre family property. So, without relocating my family and giving up my job we would own this land remotely. Yes, many people do that and I encourage your comments based on personal experience if you have them and would like to share.
We could, after retirement, move north and take my southern bred wife into some beautiful country. Realistically speaking, by then her ties to family here would be much thinner although our children will likely have numerous children. Who can leave grandbabies behind? LOL.
So, should we own this land remotely (not sure when it would be 'available' anyway) and vacation there once or twice a year until retirement or just simply let it go the way of history? There is a house on the property with probably a few out buildings of sorts.
Sincerely,
Jeff
P.S. We own a decent sized home on 5± acres currently.
My great-great-grandfather was the first private owner of 40 acres in a northern state some 150 years ago. It's been in the family ever since but the current owner (my uncle) has no male descendants. He's curious if I would be interested in keeping it in the family. Of course, my first instinctive response was HECK YES! All of my childhood and up through my teen years we would vacation on this property and there are many fond memories. Being an avid genealogical researcher of my family heritage this seemed to be an opportunity of a lifetime, I think. You see things are never quite that simple are they?
My predicament comes in that after college I moved several times with my employer and have finally settled in North Carolina 700 miles from home and nearly 900 miles from the 40 acre family property. So, without relocating my family and giving up my job we would own this land remotely. Yes, many people do that and I encourage your comments based on personal experience if you have them and would like to share.
We could, after retirement, move north and take my southern bred wife into some beautiful country. Realistically speaking, by then her ties to family here would be much thinner although our children will likely have numerous children. Who can leave grandbabies behind? LOL.
So, should we own this land remotely (not sure when it would be 'available' anyway) and vacation there once or twice a year until retirement or just simply let it go the way of history? There is a house on the property with probably a few out buildings of sorts.
Sincerely,
Jeff
P.S. We own a decent sized home on 5± acres currently.