flINTLOCK said:
...would it make sense to put a reducer fitting in the FEL circuit to slow it down?? My understanding is that it would not affect lift capacity, but simply rapidity of motion??
I'm not a hydraulic systems expert, and can't comment on what all the practical consequences might be, but from a theoretical fluid flow standpoint your understanding is correct depending on the definition of "lift capacity".
The pressure drop across a restriction is a function of the flow rate through the restricting orifice, all other things being the same. So at any given pressure, the flow rate with the restriction will be less than it would be without the restriction. The energy lost will reappear as additional heat in the fluid. That may, or may not, be a consideration in your application.
At zero flow rate, the pressure at the ram or cylinder will be the same with or without the added restrictor. Thus the static force applied by the cylinder/ram will be the same in either case. If that is the definition of "lift capacity", then there is no change due to the added restriction. However, there must be some flow rate in order to move the load. That means some pressure will be lost to the restriction - the greater the flow rate or the faster the load is moved, the higher the pressure loss.
Saying this in another way, with an added restriction in the circuit, the effect will be that for a given speed of movement, the maximum load that can be moved will be less. For a given load, the movement speed will be less. Whether this effect will be noticable or significant in your particular case is open to question.
Is there some way to safely insert a variable orifice, i.e. valve, in the flow so that you could throttle down the flow rate as needed, and restore full flow if/when required?