Pete O
Silver Member
I'm still wading my way through the refurbishment of my old Ford 4100, all of the hydraulic system inside the casing and the top cover are reassembled. I've come to stripping down the diverter valve to clean it out and renew O-rings etc and found that the housing is cracked at the lugs where it is bolted down onto the top cover. Here's a couple of photos of the valve, you can see in the photo of the underside where the two front mounting holes are broken through.



Obviously it will be quite a task to repair the casting where it is broken.
A replacement valve of the same type sells for around $700
Ford 4610 Valve - D9NNB950BB
There is a different type of diverter valve available for around $240. This link shows the type, (part number 3 in the photo) available from several different suppliers and my local dealer has quoted me about the same price.
Bare Co - Ford - Hydraulic Valves & Parts
I'm wondering if there is any particular advantage of one type over the other, particularly with regard to whether it is worth the effort to try and save the old valve rather than replace it with the cheaper type. Buying a new $700 valve is not an option but I could justify $240 for a new valve rather than a time-consuming resurrection job on the old one if it's going to do the same job.



Obviously it will be quite a task to repair the casting where it is broken.
A replacement valve of the same type sells for around $700
Ford 4610 Valve - D9NNB950BB
There is a different type of diverter valve available for around $240. This link shows the type, (part number 3 in the photo) available from several different suppliers and my local dealer has quoted me about the same price.
Bare Co - Ford - Hydraulic Valves & Parts
I'm wondering if there is any particular advantage of one type over the other, particularly with regard to whether it is worth the effort to try and save the old valve rather than replace it with the cheaper type. Buying a new $700 valve is not an option but I could justify $240 for a new valve rather than a time-consuming resurrection job on the old one if it's going to do the same job.