I've seen that style and think in some cases they would work fine. My only reservation is losing leaves and small stuff between the forks.
I'm thinking that the cutout bucket would slip under a pile like the forks, but not lose the little stuff.
Conversely, while attacking a large log, the bottom of the cut out bucket would reach far enough forward under the log to move it into it's throat, and prevent it from rolling forward as the lift begins.
I have moved many logs around the yard with a 2 wheeled hand cart like this: Lo . But, if the log is too large in diameter, it rolls forward and escapes as I start to lift it like this: LO .
It seems that each design has it's advantages and drawbacks. Perhaps we are asking too much for one grapple design to do everything well. For me it's cleaning up the forest floor as efficiently as possible.
But, the search for the perfect, or at least more perfect, Grapple goes on. /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif
Thanks for your critique.
PS: I purchased the large bucket, potato digger, and MiniHoe for the dirt work; and the grapple bucket, forks, and stump grinder for the forestry. The only dual purpose tool would be the MiniHoe, if I decide to rig a thumb for it, which, of course, would produce a new round of research! /forums/images/graemlins/smirk.gif