Do you think there should be a requirement for the person that asked a question or started a thread to sign in and respond every day or so? This looks like another effort to stimulate conversation, but we're all supplying the missing details based on how we imagine the situation. It's like these people throw these bombs over the wall and then we debate them, yet they don't participate.
So here I go taking the bait again . . .
I know for a fact that if I cut hay today it would be heavy enough to be a problem. It would NOT be spread out completely -- until after I ran a tedder through it. And even then, spread out completely, it would be a lot of hay, because I waited till it was ready to be cut.
It would be discharged from the back of a haybine in about a six foot wide row/pile, but it would be heavy enough to kill grass beneath it. Now we don't know what was used to cut the grass in this scenario, but even if it was a sickle bar mower (best case scenario), if the hay was heavy, it's not like "clippings". ((I note that the person asking about this mentioned "clippings". That's why I tried to find out how it was actually cut.))
Agree that you can ignore it and just let it decompose until you choose to bushhog it next time. That's only if you're not planning on regular cuttings as you would with a typical hay field.
BUT, if the plan is to mow hay every 30 days or so . . . and we don't know because we don't have the details . . . this brown/black rained-on mess will be mixed in with the new hay that we manage to cut next month. It will be a pain and plug equipment using sickle bars. Disc-bines won't care, but it will still be mixed into your new fresh green cut hay. It won't disappear in a month, and it won't help the quality of the new cutting. It will break down and lose some of the volume, but it won't just disappear. And it will be included in your next cutting / baling.
I got caught on the first cutting of a small field this year. Didn't get it dry enough to bale and then rain hit. It got rained on about 7 days out of 12. When it was finally dry enough to bale it, I scratched it up into windrows and baled it and got it off the field. It wasn't worth handling a second or third time and certainly wasn't worth putting in the barn. The hay was almost black. I unloaded the wagons with a grapple in an open spot and burned it. But it was worth it to get it off the field so it didn't affect the next cutting. Actually, finally cut that same field for the second time and got it baled this Thursday. It made some nice green alfalfa mix.
Had a baler break-down in late August last year. Went across the road and got the guy that was round-baling to come over and clean it up for me. We split the hay and he was happy. I could have spread it back out with a tedder, but that wouldn't have solved the problem. It never occurred to me to just leave it and let it rot.
So, when you guys say to just leave it, are you assuming that this isn't a "hay field", or are you thinking that cows will eat it anyway so just let it burn down and steam and cook for a month and then mix it in with the next cutting?
Not trying to argue. Just want to understand why you say to leave it. What are your assumptions?
To go back to my original point, I think the thread should be disabled until the person that started this discussion fills in some missing info. Is there a "suggestion box" as this seems to be a recurring problem?
Appreciate your thoughts and rationale. Thanks.