Heading for an auction this weekend
- Thread starter flusher
- Start date
- Views: 2012
Farmwithjunk
Super Member
</font><font color="blue" class="small">(
Although some of the 4 cylinders suffered from porous engine blocks but i'm not sure if it was a problem with these , Fords Replacement blocks later on had ribbed pattern on them these were good , )</font>
The 4600 was (is) a 3-cylinder same as later model 4000's. Nary a problem with this engine. It's what makes the 4000/4600 so great. Torque galore.
I'm not "up" on David Browns, but some models had a better reputation than others. Some were good tractors. Some were money pits.
My "book", an old apraisal guide from 1994 says "SU" is "special utility".
Although some of the 4 cylinders suffered from porous engine blocks but i'm not sure if it was a problem with these , Fords Replacement blocks later on had ribbed pattern on them these were good , )</font>
The 4600 was (is) a 3-cylinder same as later model 4000's. Nary a problem with this engine. It's what makes the 4000/4600 so great. Torque galore.
I'm not "up" on David Browns, but some models had a better reputation than others. Some were good tractors. Some were money pits.
My "book", an old apraisal guide from 1994 says "SU" is "special utility".
Farmwithjunk
Super Member
</font><font color="blue" class="small">(
Although some of the 4 cylinders suffered from porous engine blocks but i'm not sure if it was a problem with these , Fords Replacement blocks later on had ribbed pattern on them these were good , )</font>
The 4600 was (is) a 3-cylinder same as later model 4000's. Nary a problem with this engine. It's what makes the 4000/4600 so great. Torque galore.
I'm not "up" on David Browns, but some models had a better reputation than others. Some were good tractors. Some were money pits.
My "book", an old apraisal guide from 1994 says "SU" is "special utility".
Although some of the 4 cylinders suffered from porous engine blocks but i'm not sure if it was a problem with these , Fords Replacement blocks later on had ribbed pattern on them these were good , )</font>
The 4600 was (is) a 3-cylinder same as later model 4000's. Nary a problem with this engine. It's what makes the 4000/4600 so great. Torque galore.
I'm not "up" on David Browns, but some models had a better reputation than others. Some were good tractors. Some were money pits.
My "book", an old apraisal guide from 1994 says "SU" is "special utility".
Donnyj
Platinum Member
You are correct along with Farm with Junk. Thanks for the correction guys.
Donnyj
Platinum Member
You are correct along with Farm with Junk. Thanks for the correction guys.
