RMulkey
Silver Member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2000
- Messages
- 126
- Location
- CA, Placer County
- Tractor
- 1999 Kubota L4310 HST 4WD, R4 Tires, Folding ROPS, Kubota Canopy
Jerry,
I am not sure about the difference in cost for the high back verses low back. The high back holds about 30% more dirt when full. The low back will spill the excess dirt over the back of the box. If you have a lot of dirt to move any distance, it is probably worth the extra money. You can move more dirt in less trips. When I bought the 72" woods, it was easy to fill it up with dirt and make the wheels spin. I finally learned enough from this board to load the rear tires with water/antifreeze and now it works great. I tend to move a lot of dirt by dragging it from one location to another so the extra capacity saves time. As long as your tractor can pull the heavier load and make use of the extra dirt moving capacity, I recomend the high back scraper.
-Roger
I am not sure about the difference in cost for the high back verses low back. The high back holds about 30% more dirt when full. The low back will spill the excess dirt over the back of the box. If you have a lot of dirt to move any distance, it is probably worth the extra money. You can move more dirt in less trips. When I bought the 72" woods, it was easy to fill it up with dirt and make the wheels spin. I finally learned enough from this board to load the rear tires with water/antifreeze and now it works great. I tend to move a lot of dirt by dragging it from one location to another so the extra capacity saves time. As long as your tractor can pull the heavier load and make use of the extra dirt moving capacity, I recomend the high back scraper.
-Roger