CurlyDave
Elite Member
This is a two-part question:
We are building home on fairly mountainous property.
The well is going to be located about 400 lineal feet from the house and approximately 100' lower in elevation (~50psi just from gravity).
There will be a power transformer within 30' of the well, specifically to power the pump, my future shop and an RV pad.
The water will be routed to the house through pipes laid in a trench from the well to the house.
My thought on what the trench should contain would be two 1 1/2" PVC water lines (a primary and a spare) to feed a pressure tank at the house, two 1" water lines (again a primary and a spare) to bring water down to the shop & RV pad from the pressure tank at the house, and a 3" conduit for the signal wire from the pressure tank to the well pump. The well is close to the property entrance and this conduit would also contain signal wires and intercom wires for a future automatic gate.
My contractor has suggested that I use PEX instead of PVC. He would run the PEX in a 3" conduit (one line up and a smaller one down, separate conduits) which he claims would allow me to pull a new line if the original one ever deteriorated or failed.
My thoughts are that a PVC pipe and a spare would be less costly than a PEX line plus a conduit, and the PVC has stood the test of time, while PEX is still fairly new. For an interesting discussion of PEX see Plumbing World on PEX .
OTOH, I am not an expert on this and would like to get advice from anyone who really knows.
The second part of the question is the pump control scheme. My thought is that by running a smaller line down to the shop & RV from the pressure tank in the house, I can use a "standard" control scheme where low pressure in the tank turns on the pump, which then runs until it has filled and pressure has risen, which turns off the pump. The shop and RV would just be another load on the water system, exactly like a bathtub or washing machine in the house. The incremental cost of this would only be 800' of 1" PVC pipe laid in the trench, which is ~ $250 plus labor. Since other pipe is going in the trench, the incremental labor would only be connection of the pipe sections.
The contractor "thinks" that I could tap the 1 1/2" line feeding the pressure tank for the shop & RV. I believe that a properly-installed line would have check valves which would prevent water backflow in that line. He says I could overcome that with a special pump, and I see costs rising. Other wells in the area are 200-300' deep and a standard pump will be $3000-4000. If the special one is 10% more, I think the return line is closer to standard and much more repairable in the event of a failure.
He also claims that another possibility would be a second pressure tank at the wellhead. I do not understand how one pump can be controlled by two pressure tanks, but am willing to listen if anyone can explain that.
Any advice here?
We are building home on fairly mountainous property.
The well is going to be located about 400 lineal feet from the house and approximately 100' lower in elevation (~50psi just from gravity).
There will be a power transformer within 30' of the well, specifically to power the pump, my future shop and an RV pad.
The water will be routed to the house through pipes laid in a trench from the well to the house.
My thought on what the trench should contain would be two 1 1/2" PVC water lines (a primary and a spare) to feed a pressure tank at the house, two 1" water lines (again a primary and a spare) to bring water down to the shop & RV pad from the pressure tank at the house, and a 3" conduit for the signal wire from the pressure tank to the well pump. The well is close to the property entrance and this conduit would also contain signal wires and intercom wires for a future automatic gate.
My contractor has suggested that I use PEX instead of PVC. He would run the PEX in a 3" conduit (one line up and a smaller one down, separate conduits) which he claims would allow me to pull a new line if the original one ever deteriorated or failed.
My thoughts are that a PVC pipe and a spare would be less costly than a PEX line plus a conduit, and the PVC has stood the test of time, while PEX is still fairly new. For an interesting discussion of PEX see Plumbing World on PEX .
OTOH, I am not an expert on this and would like to get advice from anyone who really knows.
The second part of the question is the pump control scheme. My thought is that by running a smaller line down to the shop & RV from the pressure tank in the house, I can use a "standard" control scheme where low pressure in the tank turns on the pump, which then runs until it has filled and pressure has risen, which turns off the pump. The shop and RV would just be another load on the water system, exactly like a bathtub or washing machine in the house. The incremental cost of this would only be 800' of 1" PVC pipe laid in the trench, which is ~ $250 plus labor. Since other pipe is going in the trench, the incremental labor would only be connection of the pipe sections.
The contractor "thinks" that I could tap the 1 1/2" line feeding the pressure tank for the shop & RV. I believe that a properly-installed line would have check valves which would prevent water backflow in that line. He says I could overcome that with a special pump, and I see costs rising. Other wells in the area are 200-300' deep and a standard pump will be $3000-4000. If the special one is 10% more, I think the return line is closer to standard and much more repairable in the event of a failure.
He also claims that another possibility would be a second pressure tank at the wellhead. I do not understand how one pump can be controlled by two pressure tanks, but am willing to listen if anyone can explain that.
Any advice here?