Jay4200
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2005
- Messages
- 2,053
- Location
- Hudson/Weare, NH
- Tractor
- L4200GST w/ LA680 & BX2200D w/ LA211
I have a 6' 3pt snowblower with hydraulic chute controls. My open-cockpit tractor doesn't support this functionality, so I am going to add remote functions. My tractor has power beyond ports, that are used to run my backhoe, and I am going to plug into these to make my dual remotes. I am considering two options for setting up the remotes and would like suggestions/opinions/recommendations, etc.
1) Attach a rigid mounting arm to the snowblower, then connect the remote valves to that mounting arm. Design the mounting arm such that it positions the valves conveniently for control from the cockpit. Keep all remote plumbing local to the snowblower, with the exception of the two lines that will plug into the existing PB quick-connectors. I could use screw-connectors for all of the connections, eliminating many hoses and quick-connects, as I could screw all of the hoses directly into the valve body. This will allow my tractor's current configuration to remain essentially unchanged, and will set up a dedicated system for the snowblower. Hook up the blower, plug in the two lines and go. This seems to be the easiest solution and I'm sure it is far less expensive than option (2).
2) Build a full remote system that resides on the tractor. I would have to set up valving and plumbing to make a clean install. I could then use the remotes for whatever I wanted in the future, although I have no plans for anything that uses additional rear-hydraulics. This would require a bunch of extra stuff compared to (1) such as a set of 4 hoses from the remote valves to the remote quick-connects and mounting brackets for both valves and connectors (AND they have to look good). Remote quick connects would be mounted somewhere in the rear, and the blower connection would be made using it's 4 hoses and quick-connects. I would still run the two input hoses from the existing PB.
I'm on the fence, but I think I am currently leaning toward the dedicated system mounted on the blower. Pros/cons of either? ideas? Insight?
JayC
1) Attach a rigid mounting arm to the snowblower, then connect the remote valves to that mounting arm. Design the mounting arm such that it positions the valves conveniently for control from the cockpit. Keep all remote plumbing local to the snowblower, with the exception of the two lines that will plug into the existing PB quick-connectors. I could use screw-connectors for all of the connections, eliminating many hoses and quick-connects, as I could screw all of the hoses directly into the valve body. This will allow my tractor's current configuration to remain essentially unchanged, and will set up a dedicated system for the snowblower. Hook up the blower, plug in the two lines and go. This seems to be the easiest solution and I'm sure it is far less expensive than option (2).
2) Build a full remote system that resides on the tractor. I would have to set up valving and plumbing to make a clean install. I could then use the remotes for whatever I wanted in the future, although I have no plans for anything that uses additional rear-hydraulics. This would require a bunch of extra stuff compared to (1) such as a set of 4 hoses from the remote valves to the remote quick-connects and mounting brackets for both valves and connectors (AND they have to look good). Remote quick connects would be mounted somewhere in the rear, and the blower connection would be made using it's 4 hoses and quick-connects. I would still run the two input hoses from the existing PB.
I'm on the fence, but I think I am currently leaning toward the dedicated system mounted on the blower. Pros/cons of either? ideas? Insight?
JayC