Years back, I replaced the original tires on my Deere 2440 with GoodYear DynaTorque II's. (IMHO, a mistake) They're not real big on traction, and they seem to puncture when other tires don't. It may be pure coincidence, but they just seem to have more flats that the tires they replaced or other brands I have on other tractors. I got tired of killing hayfields, pastures, and my yard when dealing with leaks. (I always used ca/cl) I decided to swap out the fluid with windshield washer fluid. It's a mild solution of water, blue dye, and methenol. Just enough methenol to keep it from freezing. This tractor has 16.9X30 rears. It takes over 70 gallons to fill them to top of rims. Almost 1200# of fluid in both tires totalled. The tractor was adaquately ballasted with 1000#. Ca/cl mix would weigh over 1400#, both tires combine weight. Methenol mix was plenty heavy, didn't kill everything when there was a leak, and it hasn't caused any trouble with tubes/tires in 15 years. If methenol/water mix is of sufficient weight, it is a safe(r) alternative to corrosive/bio-unfriendly ca/cl fill.
I still use ca/cl mix in 2 other tractors. They make good use of the additional weight (over Methenol/water mix)
Me and SouNdguy are on the same page with tubeless tires and fluid not being compatable. In fact, I'm not a fan of tubeless tires, front or rear on tractors, or farm implements in general.
I won't give up on a tube just because of a patch or 2. If the tube is old, it gets replaced. If it's in decent shape, it gets patched. In 15 years, I've probably dealt with 6 or 8 flats on the Deere with methenol fill. I've NEVER had a patch to fail. If a patch or plug is properly installed, I don't believe a relatively mild solution of methenol will contribute to a tire/tube repair failure based on my experiences with it.
JMHO, and worth every bit as much as you paid for it.