More Vikckers pump ?'s...

mrcaptainbob · Jan 3, 2010

I have two Vickers pumps. V202P1351C 10 and a V105A |100|. The V202 is marked VIckers Vane Pump. I went to the Vickers/Eaton site for info but appqrently am too dumb to know how to navigate. Where can I go to find the flow, pressure and rpm requirements of these?

mrcaptainbob · Jan 4, 2010

From my previous Vickers post, George G wrote:
" Default Re: Vickers pump....
That would be a V-104-?-10. In place of the ? would be Y (1gpm), E (2 gpm), G (3 gpm), A (5 gpm), C (8 gpm), D(10 gpm). If ypu can see between the motor and pump, you should be able too see the arrow(Direction of rotation), under that, the model #. The Y, E, G & A are rated for a max speed of 1800rpm, the C a max of 1500rpm and the D is a max of 1200rpm. All are rated for a max of 1000psi."

According to the one pump (V105A10 |100|) the A indicates it's 5 gpm and 1800 rpm.

Where can I find info on the V202?

Thanks for the help....

mrcaptainbob · Jan 5, 2010

This is the nearest I can find on an Eaton site.
http://www.eatonhydraulics.com/products/pdfs/m2000s.pdf
But it doesn't quite fit part number-wise. I thought it would fit the 200 series information, but doesn't come close. Is there a better site?

George G · Jan 5, 2010

The V-104 is a "foot mount", the V-105 is a "flange mount". Thats the only difference between the two. The V202P1351C 10 would be a "foot mount" rated at 13 gpm at 1200rpm and 1000psi. It has a max psi of 2000 pounds, and a max rpm of 1800. Don't know where you are finding these pumps at. But, they are old. I hope they work.

mrcaptainbob · Jan 5, 2010

Thanks so much for the help, George G! The V105 was on my log splitter when I got it. The V202 is one I recently got from a friend.

Thanks again, George G.

Bob.

mrcaptainbob · Jan 6, 2010

I'll be going with the V202 as it will work better on this splitter application. All though it's an old pump, and supposing it works out for my use, what would be a fair price for it? I have no idea what to offer him and want to be overly fair when I do talk with him. He has no idea what it's worth either.
Thanks for any help...

Suz · Jan 9, 2010

mrcaptainbob said:
I'll be going with the V202 as it will work better on this splitter application. All though it's an old pump, and supposing it works out for my use, what would be a fair price for it? I have no idea what to offer him and want to be overly fair when I do talk with him. He has no idea what it's worth either.
Thanks for any help...

Here I am with my first post trying to give advice, but the problem of using a Vicker's vane pump for splitter is that I'm sure it is only a single stage pump.
(Most wood splitters will work better with a two stage pump.)
However I know the Vickers will work because I made splitter years ago using a V210 pump driven by a belt off the front pulley of a old combine engine. (The transmission drove a buzz saw.)
I also have a Vickers on my Dearborn 19-23 loader.
I have no idea what a old used pump would be worth, but I know repairs for them are pricey! Year's ago I spent $80 for about 24 vanes.

mrcaptainbob · Jan 9, 2010

Hi, Suz. Thanks for the guidance. And welcome here! I agree that a two stage would be much better, but this one is a better financial fit! I do have a concern, though, about driving it off of a belt. Would that cause undo wear on the bearing? Did you have a second support for the shaft? That's what I'm planning to do. Mount a pulley between the pump side and a bearing on the shaft end that would be mounted in it's own holder. So the shaft acts more like an axle.
Thanks again, Suz.

Suz · Jan 10, 2010

mrcaptainbob said:
Hi, Suz. Thanks for the guidance. And welcome here! I agree that a two stage would be much better, but this one is a better financial fit! I do have a concern, though, about driving it off of a belt. Would that cause undo wear on the bearing? Did you have a second support for the shaft? That's what I'm planning to do. Mount a pulley between the pump side and a bearing on the shaft end that would be mounted in it's own holder. So the shaft acts more like an axle.
Thanks again, Suz.

I had a 6" cast pulley mounted right on the pump shaft and experienced no bearing problems. But, that's not to say that it wasn't the best setup in the world for the pump. BTW I made foot mount for this setup when I made it.

(Here is a picture of the saw/splitter that I had the pump mounted to, but you cannot see the pump because it sat behind the wheel.)

Your idea of having a "axle" would take all the strain off the pump bearing if you want to engineer the project and have the room.

dodge85rc · Jan 10, 2010

mrcaptainbob said:
Hi, Suz. Thanks for the guidance. And welcome here! I agree that a two stage would be much better, but this one is a better financial fit! I do have a concern, though, about driving it off of a belt. Would that cause undo wear on the bearing? Did you have a second support for the shaft? That's what I'm planning to do. Mount a pulley between the pump side and a bearing on the shaft end that would be mounted in it's own holder. So the shaft acts more like an axle.
Thanks again, Suz.

Those pumps should be able to take a belt just fine.