President Bush

   / President Bush #1  

scruffy

Veteran Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2000
Messages
1,445
Location
East Tennessee / South Central Oregon
Tractor
None (at present)
I've sat on this long enough. Well over a month ago I rcvd this from one my (yeah, you know) cousins. I have no idea who the author is, but felt it needed to be shared. Please excuse the length, but it is a worthwhile read.

President Bush

This was the same man who came within a hair's breadth of losing an election in November, who withstood the political chicanery of the Florida Democratic machine to fix the vote count.

This was the same man who admitted to having a drinking problem in younger years, and whose happy-go-lucky lifestyle led him to mediocre grades in college and an ill-fated oil venture.

This was the same man who mangled syntax even more than his father, and whose speaking missteps became known as "Bushisms."

And on Friday, this was the man who bore the weight of the world and the responsibilities of a generation with dignity, class, confidence, appropriate solemnity, and even much-needed wit.

One thing struck me during the campaign, that difficult, roller-coaster campaign that now seems years ago. It was that George W. Bush never seemed to get ruffled. Whether the theft of a campaign debate video or the sudden (some would say, vicious) release of a DUI arrest two decades ago at a key moment, "W" did not lose his cool. At times, his staff seemed overconfident, as did many of us. A 350-electoral-vote win, they quietly implied . . . and we optimistically believed. Then they counted the votes, miscounted others, and re-counted still others. At the end, he was still there. Whereas Al Gore almost frantically huffed and puffed, trying to gin up something out of nothing, Bush quietly but confidently waited at his ranch.

He didn't do anything: that is the mistake people have constantly made with this man, confusing lack of bluster for absence of action. No, his team of attorneys and the iron-willed James Baker were carrying out his orders, but W stayed in the background, confident and faithful.

You see, it is this faith business that confounded everyone. We have had such actors and liars in public office that we have looked skeptically whenever anyone used the term faith. But this was the same man who was the first politician ever in recent memory to name Jesus Christ as the lord of his life on public TV. Not an oblique reference to being "born-again" or having a "life change." He said the un-PC-like phrase, "Jesus Christ," to which his handlers and advisors, no doubt, off stage, were also saying, "Jesus Christ" in a much different tone.

God has a way of honoring those who honor Him. David learned that while he was on the run from Saul's armies. Job learned that after his time of horrible tribulation. The Messiah said so Himself, many times.

So this was the man who actually put faith into practice. He actually loves those who hate him. It is a staggering concept, so foreign in daily occurrence that few thought it anything but grandstanding. Even one of W's biggest supporters chided the President for adhering to his "new tone." Yet there he was, again and again, thanking the Democrats. Appointing his enemies to high places in his government. Inviting his former foes and their wives to private movie screenings, and (I know, this is hard to stomach) even treating them with dignity. See, this was the man who learned early on how faith worked: by praying for his enemies, you "heap burning coals upon their heads."

This was the man who named the absolute top people in national security and defense, then caught barbs from the politically righteous that this one didn't have the right views on abortion or that one didn't have the right position on guns.

And on September 11, at midmorning, this was the man thrust into a position only known by Roosevelt, Churchill, Lincoln, and Washington. The weight of the world was on his shoulders, and the responsibility of a generation was on his soul. So this same man---the one that the media repeatedly attempted to tarnish
with charges of "illegitimacy," and the one whose political opponents desperately sought to stonewall
until mid-term elections---walked to his seat at the front of the National Cathedral just three days after the two most impressive symbols of American capitalism and prosperity virtually evaporated, along with, perhaps, thousands of Americans.


As he sat down next to his wife, immediately I knew that even if his faith ever faltered, hers didn't. I have never seen a more peaceful face than Laura Bush, whose eyes seemed as though they were already gazing at the final outcome . . . not just of this conflict, but of her reward in Heaven itself. In this marriage, you indeed got two for the price of one.

Then came the defining moment of our generation. Some people fondly recall their Woodstock days. Others mark with grim sadness November 22, 1963, as the day America lost her innocence. But I firmly believe when the history of this time is written, it will be acknowledged by friend and foe alike that President George W. Bush came of age in that cathedral and lifted a nation off its knees. It wasn't so much his words, though read a decade later, they will indeed be as stirring as any. This conflict would end, he noted, ". . . At a time of our choosing." It certainly wasn't his emotion. What had to have been one of the most stunning exhibitions of self-control in presidential history, W was able to deliver his remarks without losing either his resolve or his focus, or, more important, his confidence. It was as if God's hand, which had
guided him through that sliver-thin election, now rested fully on him.

His quiet confidence let our enemies know . . . and believe me, they know . . . that they made a grave miscalculation. Now, this same man who practiced his faith through a tough election, who steeled his convictions even more in a drawn-out Florida battle, and who never once gave in to the temptation
to get in the gutter with his foes (well, OK, maybe the "Clymer" comment is an exception), this same man
now lifted the weight of the world and the responsibility of a generation and put it on his modest shoulders as though it were another unpleasant duty.

As he walked back to his seat, the camera angle was appropriate. He was virtually alone in the scene, alone in that massive place of God, just him and the Lord. But that's the way it's been in his life recently. In that brief time it took him to return to his seat, I believe he heard words to the effect of, "You can do this, George. I am with you always. And you can do this well, because I am going before you. And don't worry about the weight. I've got it." And I saw in his eyes a quiet acknowledgment. "I know. Thank you, Lord."

Back at his seat, when W sat down, George H. W. Bush reached over and took his son's hand. The elder Bush always struck me as a religious man, but not someone who shared his life on a daily basis with the Lord. George H. W. treats the Father like a respected uncle, visiting Him on appropriate holidays and
knowing the relationship is real, but not constant. Anyway, I believe that in that fatherly squeeze George H. W. said, "I wish I could do this for you, son, but I can't. You have to do this on your own." W squeezed back and gave him that look of peace that Laura had kept throughout. It said, "I don't have to do it alone, dad. I've got help."

Please take a moment after you read this to pray for him - he truly does have the weight of the world on his shoulders. Pray that God will sustain him and give him wisdom and discernment in his decisions. Make no mistake about it - the decisions he makes in the coming days, weeks and months will literally define the future of our country and the free world. Pray for his protection and that of his family.

After you have prayed, send this to everyone on your e-mail list. Our President needs people around the world to be praying for him. As this makes the e-mail rounds, eventually there could literally be people praying for him 24/7!! He needs it. We all do.

author unknown
 
   / President Bush #2  
Scruffy, you could have set on that a while longer. If you could get a truthful, as opposed to a political, reply from John McCain, you might find at least one former opponent who felt Bush was less than Christ like in the recent competition. I support the president in his efforts to fight terrorism. I see no need, and no compelling reason, to deify the man.

Chuck
 
   / President Bush #3  
scruffy, look behind your back. Bush through Ashcroft is declaring short-cuts already in civil rights with military tribunals instead of civillan trial, easy wire taps, monitored lawyer/client interactions and even worse INS (Immigration & Naturalization Service) incarceration with "cause" criteria without monitoring by judicial oversight. Now, obstinsively, these are for "non citizens" but foriegn born US citizens have already been sweep up in this Kafka maze. This is a very slippery slope. Patrick Leahy, senator from Vermont will be holding hearing on this very question soon.

RCH
 
   / President Bush #4  
Great stuff Scruffy...

I for one appreciate your posting it. I think he is doing a wonderful job stopping these less than socialized factions who obviously place little value on human life, good citizenship and the basic human rights of those who bore them.

Dr Dan
 
   / President Bush #5  
rch - the "slippery slope" argument is as old as the hills and about as accurate. There has been and always will be, a necessary balance between civil liberties and the need for government to intrude into our lives in order to carry out one of governments responsibilities: maintaining order and protecting the citizens from people who would do us harm. Think of it as a sliding scale with total civil liberities on one end and total government authority on the other. The "balance" will slide in one direction or the other depending on current circumstances. Today it is necessary to slide in the direction of governmental authority. In the future if the world becomes more stable perhaps we can "slide" the balance in favor of more liberties. At the moment I would rather be safe from terrorists than from my government. Believe it or not law enforcement is way too busy and understaffed to be looking at innocent people, there-fore law abiding people will be unaffected by the new legislation (Unless you buy into the "slippery slope" argument!!)
 
   / President Bush #6  
Branding an argument with a perjorative moniker doesn't refute it. The price of liberty is eternal vigilance- also an "old" arguement.

RCH
 
   / President Bush #7  
Umm excuse my ignorance, but what's a "perjorative moniker"?
 
   / President Bush #8  
<font color=blue>what's a "perjorative moniker"?</font color=blue>

Glad someone else asked the question 'cuz I was wondering the same thing. /w3tcompact/icons/crazy.gif

Seems like I've heard the expression or at least something similar. "Moniker" is slang for a personal nickname, but I can't find "perjorative" in any of my dictionaries, slang or not. Sounds like it should be derived from "perjure", but I can't prove it.

Maybe my dictionaries ain't as good as I thunk. /w3tcompact/icons/wink.gif

ain't (Ent) Non-Standard 1. Am not. 2. Used also as a contraction for are not, is not, has not, and have not.

thunk 2 (thîngk) v. Non-Standard 1. A past tense and a past participle of think.

HarvSig.gif
 
   / President Bush #9  
From http://www.dictionary.com

pe·jor·a·tive (p-jôr-tv, -jr-, pj-rtv, pj-)
adj.

1.Tending to make or become worse.
2.Disparaging; belittling.

mon·i·ker or mon·ick·er (mn-kr)
n. Slang

A personal name or nickname.

tractor.gif
 
   / President Bush #10  
So I says to myself, ..."Go ahead, jump right in!"

Herewith 2 more cents worth:
A tad long ...

I prefer my politics and my religious concepts SEPARATE.

Not only that, but I prefer my politics and anybody ELSE'S religious concepts separate.

Wrapping a politician in either the flag OR the Bible (capital "B" a courtesy) only makes the real person harder to see.

Every nation has a flag.
And I'm unimpressed by the fact that God (same courtesy) is on anybody's "side" in a war, because He is on EVERYBODY'S side, ...just ask them!

Re. "slippery slopes": Any place you find politicians will be slippery, sloped or level, because of all the BS covering whatever is going-on.

Eternal vigilence IS the price of liberty, an inch-given will be a mile-taken, and that which is sorely-won, once foolishly-lost will be doubly sorely re-won.

If, as we say we believe, our imperfect system is the best in the world, ...let's be loyal to it's principles and use it.

If it's not, let's admit it, drop the pretense of nobility, and simply kick-ass, using the "might-makes-right" approach that we claim to abhor.

A post in this thread commented on getting the "lawbreakers". There's the rub, ...you think you've got the "lawbreaker" and so the innocent person that you have MISTAKEN for a "lawbreaker" is deprived of the rights/due-process that are SUPPOSED to be the American-heritage of the innocent.

This 'presumption of guilt' once-suspected, has, till now, been the tactic of the dictator and the police-state.

I'm one of those who believes that if the terrorists have made these methods a part of "America", their job of destroying it, by shaking our so-fragile confidence in our principles, is half done.

I would like to see a president support the view that fighting for America would, above all, NOT mean abandoning it's fundamentally virtuous ideology.

Secret trials, simple or 2/3 majority death verdicts, holding incommunicado, etc. are the sorts of things that millions have come to America to ESCAPE. Shame on us, if we are the generation that makes a lie of that promise.

I certainly support killing, as an effective method of dealing with the enemy in combat, and probably even "targeted-assasination" of known 'bad guys", ala Israel's actions, ...but the treatment of those IN OUR CUSTODY has traditionally (to the country's honor) been a matter of lawful procedure.

The fact that precedents may exist does not prove(at least not to me) that the government (president) should be given a blank "power check", to be cashed against our civil liberties and protective "rights", because it can be advertised as being "in our best interests". And anyone who believes the "slippery slope" is an inaccurate metaphor, in my opinion, has not studied the extent to which individual freedoms have already "slipped" away from some of the original concepts. And further movement will be much more difficult "uphill" than down. (Anyone willing to have their eyes-opened on this subject will find enlightenment in a book by James Bovard, "Lost Rights, ..the Destruction of American Liberty".)

Personally, and regretably, I don't think the citizens of today have anywhere near the right "stuff" that our father's generation(WWII), OR the American revolutionaries had. I'm afraid that the ignorance of today's (average)students re. history/citizenship is exceeded only by their inability to spell "cat".

I guess it boils down to whether you believe your best protection comes from the great plan for a nation drawn-up by the exceptional group who founded this country, or from this year's "king" of Capitol Hill.

There is not now, nor has there been in recent memory, a national leader whose judgement and idealism I would trust more than that of Franklin, Jefferson, Adams, et. al.

And his private ideas (guesses, ...lest we forget) concerning any "creator" shouldn't become public displays or pronouncements supporting any particular belief system - it is inappropriate for a leader of a mixed-faith society. (because of the seeming endorsement/favoritism and his so-easily-abused privilege of the "bully pulpit".)

We have-elected/are-paying him to function as a political leader, ...not a preacher.

History, and the planet, are full of examples of cultures which have been dominated by one religion or another.

I don't consider any of them to have been/be "shining" examples. And I sure don't want America to join the list.

Freedom OF religion only really exists where freedom FROM religion is possible.

I think we'd be better served if we were all "waving" PRINCIPLES along with the flags that are everywhere so-proudly displayed. And if we remember what we should be fighting FOR while we are busy with what we are fighting AGAINST.

I know, ... a less-than-rosy picture of current happenings.
Still, that's the way things look to this grumpy old(er) man.

I'd be delighted to discover that more optimism was in order.

Larry
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

TANK (A48992)
TANK (A48992)
WHEEL LOADER BUCKET (A46683)
WHEEL LOADER...
2011 JACK 130BBL (A48992)
2011 JACK 130BBL...
2019 MMDI 14ft T/A Utility Trailer w/ Fuel Tank (A48082)
2019 MMDI 14ft T/A...
KUBOTA M135X TRACTOR (A48992)
KUBOTA M135X...
2013 VOLVO VNL860 TANDEM AXLE SLEEPER (A45679)
2013 VOLVO VNL860...
 
Top