Probably not the best forum for this...

[Dadnatron]

Hardly crying wolf...LoL

It is the FDA doing the study...it was data from early findings of the yet released study that states Glyphosate was found in all the foods they tested...

It is other studies and legal findings in multiple lawsuits that link glyphosate to health issues...

Two different issues...one, glyphosate in food...and two, glyphosate health concerns...

Silicone gel breast implants were 'found by a jury' to cause Lupus type illnesses. The lawsuit was awarded a $3.2B settlement on top of the almost $1B already paid... only to find out when REAL research was completed, that there was NO relation between AutoImmune disease and silicone breast implants.

So... your view that a 'lawsuit' has been made is proof of anything is only proof that you don't understand the issue and/or you don't have the desire to understand it honestly. It is completely invalid in my estimation, on MANY counts... but with this specific example leading the way in which 'jury awards' and 'lawsuits' do not Prove a **** thing.

Breast Implants ludicrous lawsuit timeline and ultimate BS proof.

And a soon to be released study by the FDA stating glyphosate has been found in food has no bearing on whether it, the glyphosate, at the amounts found, has any detrimental effect on a person. You could as easily say that it has a beneficial effect, because since glyphosate has been in use, life expectancy has increased by 8 years.

 

[Dadnatron]

Hardly crying wolf...LoL

It is the FDA doing the study...it was data from early findings of the yet released study that states Glyphosate was found in all the foods they tested...

FDA Glyphosate -

What have the results been so far?

Preliminary results for glyphosate testing showed no pesticide residue violations for glyphosate in all four commodities tested (soybeans, corn, milk, and eggs).

 

[/pine]

FDA Glyphosate -

What have the results been so far?

Preliminary results for glyphosate testing showed no pesticide residue violations for glyphosate in all four commodities tested (soybeans, corn, milk, and eggs).

And they still allow a certain amount of rat feces and rodent hairs in hot dogs...as long as they are below legal levels...DUH

 

[/pine]

Silicone gel breast implants were 'found by a jury' to cause cancer. The lawsuit was awarded a $3.2B settlement on top of the almost $1B already paid... only to find out when REAL research was completed, that there was NO relation between AutoImmune disease and silicone breast implants.

So... your view that a 'lawsuit' has been made is proof of anything is only proof that you don't understand the issue and/or you don't have the desire to understand it honestly. It is completely invalid in my estimation, on MANY counts... but with this specific example leading the way in which 'jury awards' and 'lawsuits' do not Prove a **** thing.

Breast Implants ludicrous lawsuit timeline and ultimate BS proof.

And a soon to be released study by the FDA stating glyphosate has been found in food has no bearing on whether it, the glyphosate, at the amounts found, has any detrimental effect on a person. You could as easily say that it has a beneficial effect, because since glyphosate has been in use, life expectancy has increased by 8 years.

Get real...geeze...!

What lawsuit awards actually mean is usually that a plaintiff has not accepted a settlement and let a jury hear all the evidence and make a decision...

If a lawsuit is not settled out of court...jury awards speak volumes because they get to hear and see the evidence where as settlements usually just have non disclosure agreements...

and BTW your rubber titty comparison is ludicrous...

 

[Dadnatron]

OK, are you really that dense or are you simply pushing an ideal?

You specifically used a lawsuit as 'proof' after I asked for data. Now you are saying they have no bearing?

And your very own FDA, which you continually tout in the 'soon to be released report' is who stated what I used above, again, after asking for DATA.

If you really choose not to or are incapable of, having a valid conversation with consistency between your posts, that's fine. But it also explains your views better than I can shoot them down.

 

[/pine]

OK, are you really that dense or are you simply pushing an ideal?

You specifically used a lawsuit as 'proof' after I asked for data. Now you are saying they have no bearing?

And your very own FDA, which you continually tout in the 'soon to be released report' is who stated what I used above, again, after asking for DATA.

If you really choose not to or are incapable of, having a valid conversation with consistency between your posts, that's fine. But it also explains your views better than I can shoot them down.

You are the one that seems to have the comprehension problem...
And BTW...the most recent data from the FDA was completed in 2015 and released 11/17...all the released data is nearly 3 years old before it is released to the public...

FYI...The next release of data will be for 2016 and won't likely be released until late this year or early 2019...

 

[tcreeley]

Where do you get this 'information'? Especially about concentration in liver and kidneys?

How do you equate increased cancer with glyphosate? Why not cell phone use or airplane flights? They have increased far more in usage than glyphosate.

read the articles I post and follow their links

 

[tcreeley]

People are making their choices count in the market place. Processed food providers would be wise to heed those choices with better, healthier ingredients.

Processed Food is Dying: Nestle Takes Worst Hit in 2 Years as Public Opinion Shifts

 

[Gator6x4]

For the Republicans To say that glyphosate is contaminating the nation food supply would mean they believe it is happening yet are trying to dismantle the EPA so nothing will be done about it.

 

[Thall303]

This entire conversation should be over in nasty, inane politics!