pilemonkey
New member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2006
- Messages
- 8
i am in the process of researching CUT's and i have developed a warm spot spot for kioti. i am looking for something in the 25-30 hp range, FEL, Hydrostatic trans, R4's. this tractor would be used for the following: maintaining a 300' gravel road/driveway, spreading gravel/stone/loam/mulch/chips (maybe 15 yds total per year), lugging/moving things around a 2-3 acre property (firewood, rocks, seasonal furniture, shrubs, oddball scavenged goods, etc.), removing snow initially from a paved +/-50' long driveway and later from the 300' long road/driveway.
obviously the ck20 is not in the 25-30hp range, but i have been rather impressed with the reviews and descriptions of worked performed with it on these forums, so it is still in the running...
on to the questions:
weight - the ck20/25/30 are all significantly heavier than their competitors. the only drawbacks to this that i have thought of so far are that it would tend to foul up a lawn more if used for mowing (i won't be), and possibly issues when trailering (potentially larger, heavier trailer required). is there anything else i should be considering with respect to the additional weight?
hydraulic flow - the 20/25/30 all have higher flow rates than competitors. i would tend to think this would lead to smoother operation when doing more than one function (driving and lowering loader arms, for instance). is this the case?
PTO:Gross HP: the 20/25/30 have somewhat lower PTO:gross HP ratios when compared to competitors. not a huge difference, however (about 73% vs. 76%). is this relevant, or should i be looking at gross hp and pto hp based on implement requirements only?
HP:tractor weight: given the fact that these machines are fairly heavy, the HP:weight ratios are somewhat low. is this an issue?
fyi: "competitors" in this case are JD, NH, and Kubota
thanks in advance for any input.
obviously the ck20 is not in the 25-30hp range, but i have been rather impressed with the reviews and descriptions of worked performed with it on these forums, so it is still in the running...
on to the questions:
weight - the ck20/25/30 are all significantly heavier than their competitors. the only drawbacks to this that i have thought of so far are that it would tend to foul up a lawn more if used for mowing (i won't be), and possibly issues when trailering (potentially larger, heavier trailer required). is there anything else i should be considering with respect to the additional weight?
hydraulic flow - the 20/25/30 all have higher flow rates than competitors. i would tend to think this would lead to smoother operation when doing more than one function (driving and lowering loader arms, for instance). is this the case?
PTO:Gross HP: the 20/25/30 have somewhat lower PTO:gross HP ratios when compared to competitors. not a huge difference, however (about 73% vs. 76%). is this relevant, or should i be looking at gross hp and pto hp based on implement requirements only?
HP:tractor weight: given the fact that these machines are fairly heavy, the HP:weight ratios are somewhat low. is this an issue?
fyi: "competitors" in this case are JD, NH, and Kubota
thanks in advance for any input.