MotorSeven
Elite Member
My neighbor wanted help doing a 100 hr service on his Ranger. FYI, you MUST clamp off the upper vent line on the oil reservoir & prime it even if you don't remove and clean the screen in the lower oil line. The owners manual is not too clear on this, so if you don't it will not pump oil after an oil change....this would not be good.
Anyway, we got everything done and were looking at his worn tires. He just ordered new ones and I commented that the toe-in on one side(front) was way off and his tires were worn more on the inside. I used a 10' 1" square aluminium tube for a straight edge. Placing it on the drivers rear tire across the center, we measured to the straight edge from each side of the drivers front rim, turning the steering wheel until the gap was even(about 1 3/4"). Then we went to the passenger side and did exactly the same thing. But, here is the confusing part, once I adjusted the tie rod(pas side), the gap on the passenger side was 5/8"....while the drivers side remained at 1 3/4. This is a 1 1/4" difference from driver to passenger side.
So we sat there testing theories, and I was looking at my Bulldog, so I thought, "what the heck, I'll check my machine". Well, it was almost identical with a little over 1" more gap on the drivers side. Soooo, my question is, did I do something wrong, or are these machines built with not much attention to front end alignment to the rear?
I triple checked the straight edge and it is almost perfect over 10 feet. We checked the rear tires in relation to the frames and they appear centered. Both machines tracked down the road fine with no pulling to right or left. I know Polaris machines have a "cant" to their front tires...kinda like the old VW bugs which straightens out with speed. This is not what we were trying to fix. What we were looking at was one tire pointed straight ahead, and the other angled out by quite a bit(his was almost 1.5 inches out before we started).
Anyway, we got everything done and were looking at his worn tires. He just ordered new ones and I commented that the toe-in on one side(front) was way off and his tires were worn more on the inside. I used a 10' 1" square aluminium tube for a straight edge. Placing it on the drivers rear tire across the center, we measured to the straight edge from each side of the drivers front rim, turning the steering wheel until the gap was even(about 1 3/4"). Then we went to the passenger side and did exactly the same thing. But, here is the confusing part, once I adjusted the tie rod(pas side), the gap on the passenger side was 5/8"....while the drivers side remained at 1 3/4. This is a 1 1/4" difference from driver to passenger side.
So we sat there testing theories, and I was looking at my Bulldog, so I thought, "what the heck, I'll check my machine". Well, it was almost identical with a little over 1" more gap on the drivers side. Soooo, my question is, did I do something wrong, or are these machines built with not much attention to front end alignment to the rear?
I triple checked the straight edge and it is almost perfect over 10 feet. We checked the rear tires in relation to the frames and they appear centered. Both machines tracked down the road fine with no pulling to right or left. I know Polaris machines have a "cant" to their front tires...kinda like the old VW bugs which straightens out with speed. This is not what we were trying to fix. What we were looking at was one tire pointed straight ahead, and the other angled out by quite a bit(his was almost 1.5 inches out before we started).