Maka
Veteran Member
OK, I have been doing some thinking on this and would like to ask a question as I think the numbers are pretty good after some thought and close looking.
Lets take a T330 and it specs says 2078lbs hitch lift capacity and 1199lbs at 24" behind the link ends.
Now, looking at the Kubota L3400 and you see 1998lbs at lift point and 1435lbs 24" behind the lift point.
Now, here is my thoughts. I have spoken to sevreal design engineers at some manufacturers of tractors. They say the lift point referred to by manufacturers is the point where the lower 3 point lift arms attach to the upper lift and this is about 12" closer to the tractor than the link end.
So, if TYM's T330 is measured at 24" behind the link end (the cat 1 ball) then it is a superior and more accurate measurement because it is actually measured 3 feet further forward than Kubota measures and thus is more accurate as that is where you implements really are. If the Kubota meausred its spec the same location that TYM did then it would be a much less lift capacity than published compared to TYM.
Does this make sense? Am I wrong in this. I am looking at the wording on both specs and it seems pretty clear to me anyway. What do you all think?
Maka
Lets take a T330 and it specs says 2078lbs hitch lift capacity and 1199lbs at 24" behind the link ends.
Now, looking at the Kubota L3400 and you see 1998lbs at lift point and 1435lbs 24" behind the lift point.
Now, here is my thoughts. I have spoken to sevreal design engineers at some manufacturers of tractors. They say the lift point referred to by manufacturers is the point where the lower 3 point lift arms attach to the upper lift and this is about 12" closer to the tractor than the link end.
So, if TYM's T330 is measured at 24" behind the link end (the cat 1 ball) then it is a superior and more accurate measurement because it is actually measured 3 feet further forward than Kubota measures and thus is more accurate as that is where you implements really are. If the Kubota meausred its spec the same location that TYM did then it would be a much less lift capacity than published compared to TYM.
Does this make sense? Am I wrong in this. I am looking at the wording on both specs and it seems pretty clear to me anyway. What do you all think?
Maka