Thank You!

   / Thank You! #21  
   / Thank You! #22  
I looked very closely at them both. For my purposes, the TYM was better. Better lift. More features standard.

I would have thought they would both be very similar. But, I haven't taken a close look at the specs for TYM.

Mike
 
   / Thank You!
  • Thread Starter
#23  
Many things are close.

5520 vT574 (hydros)

Pros for 5520:
4 range transmission
Hydraulic flow 9.3 gpm (vs 7.66)
Width 64.9" v 63.8"
Ground clearance 15.5" v 13.8"
Faster loader times (due to flow)
Metal hood and fenders (if that matters)
Rear work light standard

Pros for T574
2 pairs hydraulic remotes standard (vs 0)
Fuel tank 17 gal vs 11.8 gal
3pt lift 3822 lbs vs 3306 lbs
Weight 3871 lbs vs 3831 lbs (very minor difference)
FEL max lift at pins 2790 lbs vs 2701 lbs (again very small)
Max height 109.4" vs 107"
Breakout force 5316 lbs vs 3660 lbs
Digging depth 5.5" vs 3.1"
Bucket capacity 11.3 cu ft vs 9.5 cu ft
Cylinders 60x35mm vs 55x30mm
Rear lever for 3pt adjust
3rd function ready (buttons on joystick)
Arm rests on seat
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2015 Ford Explorer AWD SUV (A50324)
2015 Ford Explorer...
4- 6 DRILL COLLARS (A50854)
4- 6 DRILL COLLARS...
2018 PETERBILT 567 (A50854)
2018 PETERBILT 567...
2015 MACK GU713 DAYCAB (A50854)
2015 MACK GU713...
1994 Toyota 6000lbs 2 Stage Forklift (A51039)
1994 Toyota...
2016 Ford F-150 Ext. Cab Pickup Truck (A50323)
2016 Ford F-150...
 
Top