Glowplug
Veteran Member
Could someone please briefly explain the evolution and relationships in regards to Case, New Holland, Ford, International Harvester, and Farmall? I say "brief" because I have a very short attention span.
bill177 said:Here is a place you can go for real information:
Antique Tractors - Yesterday's Tractors : Antique Tractor Headquarters
It gets even more complicated. Don't forget that Case acquired David Brown some years before buying/merging with IH. Case-IH had acquired Steiger as well. Also, Ford acquired New Holland and Versatile prior to selling to Fiat. Now Versatile is owned by Buhler, and Fiat had to sell the Hesston hay and forage division, which was bought by AGCO.JoeinTX said:The Tenneco company owned Case in the early 80s when it then also acquired International Harvester....no need to continue two seperate ag lines, thus the birth of Case International as the two were merged into one working entity. Fiat Agri purchased the Ford ag line in the early 90s and adopted the "New Holland" label going forward for all lines....no more Ford or Fiat. In the late 1990s, New Holland and CIH merged and began developing common platforms for tractors and some other equipment while retaining their established brands as semi-seperate marketing/sales divisions. As a result of this merger several parts of each company had to be sold in order to comply with U.S. and European anti-trust laws lest they be seen as controlling too much of the ag equipment industry. Among these, one was the Doncaster U.K. plant which built CIH tractors that was sold off to the ARGO group..... the owners of the Landini tractor/Laverda harvester lines. As part of the sale, the "McCormick" naming rights were obtained and these former CIH tractors are now marketed under this brand.
The "Farmall" name was resurrected to put on a new line of compact tractors on CaseIH side.
Family tree? Interbred as all get out.....
JoeinTX said:The Tenneco company owned Case in the early 80s when it then also acquired International Harvester....no need to continue two seperate ag lines, thus the birth of Case International as the two were merged into one working entity. Fiat Agri purchased the Ford ag line in the early 90s and adopted the "New Holland" label going forward for all lines....no more Ford or Fiat. In the late 1990s, New Holland and CIH merged and began developing common platforms for tractors and some other equipment while retaining their established brands as semi-seperate marketing/sales divisions. As a result of this merger several parts of each company had to be sold in order to comply with U.S. and European anti-trust laws lest they be seen as controlling too much of the ag equipment industry. Among these, one was the Doncaster U.K. plant which built CIH tractors that was sold off to the ARGO group..... the owners of the Landini tractor/Laverda harvester lines. As part of the sale, the "McCormick" naming rights were obtained and these former CIH tractors are now marketed under this brand.
The "Farmall" name was resurrected to put on a new line of compact tractors on CaseIH side.
Family tree? Interbred as all get out.....
D7E said:Ford also had their name on Versatile and steiger tractors in the 80's and 90's
and i see new holland have their name on kobelco excavators and Ag Chem rogator sprayer , only 754 i think ( baby model ). And Buhler have the old genesis tractor , have they altered the old genesis or just red paint?
N80 said:John Deere has a poster (saw it in a JD dealer's office) that shows all the in breeding. Of course it shows JD as a continuous unbroken line and does not show any of the Japanese makers.
Glowplug said:Wow!! I knew there were some relationships but I didn't realize there were so many mergers and so much inbreeding! Does help explain a lot of the confusing manufacturer nomenclature though. I guess Kubota and John Deere are outsiders crashing the family reunion!Although I heard somewhere that Deere and Komatsu have some sort of relationship. Makes ya wonder if Kubota and Deere are actually Japanese cousins!!
![]()
swines said:Why should it?
N80 said:I didn't say it should I just said it didn't.
But, from a consumer's standpoint I'd rather know who is actually making the stuff than who owns the company on paper or what color they paint the tractor.