dnw64
Veteran Member
Hi,
I am looking into getting a SCUT. I had planned on buying a used "bigger" name one such as Kubota, JD or maybe Mahindra. However at this point I'm considering a TYM 254HST. I've been quoted $15.9k with loader and cab (heat only, no AC).
There have been several issues that have lead me to consider a new TYM:
So my question comes down to, "Can a tractor that costs roughly half what another does, be anywhere near as well designed and built?". I don't mind if it's not quite as ergonomic, fancy looking, bells and whistles etc. I just want something that I can use for 20-30 years with reliability of function and parts availability.
At our shop we bought a lesser brand 4-sided moulder. The top brand one would have been $140k and we paid $98k for this one. It does a fine job, but it's not as operator friendly, and parts/tech support is not near as good. If we were to replace it we'd spend the extra dough next time. But that gets used every day. I doubt I'll use my tractor more than 20 hours a year so my priorities are different.
Any pearls of wisdom?
I am looking into getting a SCUT. I had planned on buying a used "bigger" name one such as Kubota, JD or maybe Mahindra. However at this point I'm considering a TYM 254HST. I've been quoted $15.9k with loader and cab (heat only, no AC).
There have been several issues that have lead me to consider a new TYM:
- I will be using this mostly for snowblowing, so a heated cab is high on the priority list, and most smaller tractors do not have a factory cab option.
- The Bigger Name tractors are ridiculously expensive, IMO. For instance a nearby dealer has a 1998 JD790 with loader and canopy (6 more HP but Gear rather than HST) and they want as much as the brand new TYM 254. They also have a 3 year old Kubota B2650 with cab/loader at $23,500 (ok, their cab has AC as well, which I don't need)!
- The older tractors I've looked at tend to be just too physically big (7' garage door) to put a cab on, even a custom built one. Plus then I have to consider how available parts will be in 20 years on what will then be a 50 year old tractor.
So my question comes down to, "Can a tractor that costs roughly half what another does, be anywhere near as well designed and built?". I don't mind if it's not quite as ergonomic, fancy looking, bells and whistles etc. I just want something that I can use for 20-30 years with reliability of function and parts availability.
At our shop we bought a lesser brand 4-sided moulder. The top brand one would have been $140k and we paid $98k for this one. It does a fine job, but it's not as operator friendly, and parts/tech support is not near as good. If we were to replace it we'd spend the extra dough next time. But that gets used every day. I doubt I'll use my tractor more than 20 hours a year so my priorities are different.
Any pearls of wisdom?