I can't argue with that, ESBkevin... well articulated.
My only point is that it seems when liberal actors break the law -- whether it's assault, drug possession, weapons violations, being caught high on heroin on set, spousal abuse, or whatever -- the typical response is "they have anger issues and need assistance" or "he/she has been suffering from the disease of drug dependency" or whatever -- even the ones that are clearly a-holes. It surprised me that the BBC -- which has struggled for years to be "relevant" in the face of modern programming and satellite alternatives in the UK and Europe, would put one of their shows at risk and hang the guy out to dry without any of the typical "he needs help to address his personal issues and we will support him while he is taking a brief hiatus" rhetoric. ESPECIALLY after over 1 MILLION people signed a petition to keep him on the show... that had to be a hard decision to make for a struggling network. I wonder if things would have been different if he had been towing the liberal-party line of the BBC?