The 15 series is a bit smaller than the 20/25 families (maybe 5-10% bigger), but is significantly lighter (3000-ish vs 4000+ lbs). This is due to the larger/beefier chassis that Eric mentioned. The extra weight, wheelbase, and track width of the 20/25 families (increasing traction and stability) are an asset if you intend to use larger ground engaging implements and/or lift and move larger loads with the FEL.
Earlier 15 series (with the SL15 loader) were rated at 1835 lbs lift to full height. Earlier 20 series tractors with the BL25R loader were rated for 2100 lbs. The newest 15 series tractors now have a loader (BL150) that is rated at 2200 lbs to full height at the pins. That's close to the current 20/25 loaders (BL200) which are rated at 2701 lbs. Those numbers are pretty close, but they don't tell the whole story. If you're planning on moving larger/heavier items (pushing 1500 lbs or more) with the FEL, especially if you're going to be lifting them to or near full height, then I'd suggest you go with the 20/25 series.
That's one of the primary reasons why I decided to move up to the 20 series from the 15 series that I'd been considering earlier. Better traction when moving large/heavy 'project' trucks and such around the property and running ground engaging implements was another. If you're not going to be lifting stuff on the high end of the FEL rating up to/near max height, and don't need the extra stability or traction (and/or the extra weight isn't desirable), then the 15 series would be a better way to go.
They are very capable machines, at the top of their class in performance and durability. There's engine HP overlap between the 15 series and the larger 20 and 25 series tractors to address the different needs of their customers. Some folks need more PTO HP, but don't need the higher weight of the 20 and 25 series. Others need the higher weight, but have no use for the higher PTO horsepower 40 thru 55 HP 20 and 25 series machines. That's why Branson sells 3520 and 3725 tractors (and used to sell a 3020) as well as 4015 and 4815 tractors.
Machines with "R" at the tail of the model designation (such as 3015R) have 12 speed (4x3) shuttle shift transmissions with conventional clutches. The f/r shuttle is synchronized, as is the four speed main box. The 3 speed range box is not synchronized. They have both hand and foot throttles, and have independent PTO's. The H machines (such as 3015H) have three range hydrostatic transmissions with independent PTO. The transmission pedals (F/R) are side by side, and are linked to the throttle. As you step on a pedal (starting the rig moving, and then increasing speed/decreasing gear ratio), the engine RPM's are increased to help with the ratio changes.
One other thing to consider is you elevation. I see that you're in Colorado. You're likely at or above a mile (5280ft) above sea level. I've seen various formulas for figuring how much HP is lost as you increase elevation above sea level. 3% loss per 1000 ft over sea level is common. I'm at 200 ft and change above seal level, but will be moving to Wyoming within the next year or two. 7000-ish feet elevation (Average for the state of Wy) would mean as much as 21% power loss. Very significant, especially as I plan on running PTO powered implements and would like to have 30 PTO HP or more available.
For this reason, I decided to go with a turbocharged model as they are much less affected by power loss due to high elevation. For the 15, 20, and 25 series tractors this means the 4015R/H, 4815R/H, 4020R/H, and 5220R/H. A 4520R would loose up to almost 9 of its 42 PTO HP, putting it (on paper) at about the same PTO output as the less expensive turbocharged 4020R. A 4225R would have lost up to 7.5 of its 36 PTO HP..........knocking it down to 28.5. I went with the 4020R and am extremely happy with it. I couldn't quite justify to SWMBO (or myself) taking the big step up to the turbocharged 5220R.
