Bob_Skurka
Super Member
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2003
- Messages
- 7,503
Mark, I think my posts lay blame all over the place.
At our company the CEO makes about $125,000, and that includes his car, health benefits, etc.
I think you can always find a shining example of abuse. Executive abuse. Absolutely. Government stupidity. Absolutely. Union greed. Absolutely. Our culture of ME ME ME first, everyone else last. Absolutely.
But to your point about if the CEO would have taken $10,000,000 less one year everyone else would have gotten. . .
I think that is erroneous thought. Because the consumer is still the king and if the end product is not cheap enough or good enough or pretty enough or functional enough, or some combination of all those things then it won't matter because we won't buy it. And so to say that we could/should give everyone a raise by cutting the CEO's pay still buys into the mentality that can be uncompetitive at the expense of someone else. We have to compete on all fronts with our goods or nobody, including us, will buy them.
At our company the CEO makes about $125,000, and that includes his car, health benefits, etc.
I think you can always find a shining example of abuse. Executive abuse. Absolutely. Government stupidity. Absolutely. Union greed. Absolutely. Our culture of ME ME ME first, everyone else last. Absolutely.
But to your point about if the CEO would have taken $10,000,000 less one year everyone else would have gotten. . .
I think that is erroneous thought. Because the consumer is still the king and if the end product is not cheap enough or good enough or pretty enough or functional enough, or some combination of all those things then it won't matter because we won't buy it. And so to say that we could/should give everyone a raise by cutting the CEO's pay still buys into the mentality that can be uncompetitive at the expense of someone else. We have to compete on all fronts with our goods or nobody, including us, will buy them.