Spudland_Dave
Veteran Member
And what exactly is the purpose of this bill? To force companies to "carry" small under performing dealers and keep them in business? Believe me I don't like the idea of one dealer (in any business, not just tractors) controlling the market but at some point isn't the "small" dealer responsible for not making the changes required to keep up with the times? Trust me I would like to go to the old "Flying A" gas station again on the corner and buy a .5 cent Coke and play a .10 cent game of pool but I don't see that happening...
I dunno, I'm gonna have to say 2 thumbs up for that bill (Just wish it was federal, )
If Deere or any other MFG wants to control the market like they want, they should just open up corporate stores and be done with it. IMO, a MFG should sell Product A to any dealer and leave it at that. Its up to the dealer to make a profit however they see fit. Its a free market.
I look at it is if I think I could make money selling Deere (or any other brand) in my area, I should be able to open up a shop and do so...if I loose my shirt, well, thats my problem...Even if I won the powerball tomorrow and built a 25 million dollar shop, I probably couldnt sell Deere products...Whats wrong with that picture?
Word on the streets is that Deere is pulling dealerships who arent signing up for the "Deere-Mart" mentality...I heard that if a Mom & Pop shop gets onboard for the new mentality & shop design, they are good to go. It has less to do with moving tractors and more to do with moving T-shirts & JD Wind Chimes.