I just saw this thread - what a terrible, terrible shame, such a horrific way to go.
From the photo, it looks to be a Vermeer 1800 (18") like mine, or maybe a 1250 (12") . I have to believe that the operator was unable to reverse the feed rollers. The safety bar seems to be in place, but either he didn't/couldn't reach it in time (unlikely), or it didn't do its job.
The safety bar controls a hydraulic valve on the top of the machine that controls hydraulic flow to the two 18" diameter vertically-mounted feed rollers. The "default" position (LH feed roller turning CCW, RH feed roller turning CW) is "bar pulled back". Push forward a little on the bar to the middle detented position of the valve, and all hydraulic flow is cut off and the rollers stop. Push all the way forward on the safety bar and the rollers reverse direction (LH feed roller CW, RH feed roller CCW).
I take very good care of the safety bar, linkage, and valve, to say the least. I have often relied on it to save me from the same awful fate, and have thought many many times about what might have happened if I went to reverse the feed rollers and nothing happened. I have gone so far as to wonder which way I would prefer to go, head-first or feet first. I keep thinking head-first would be better.
There are many ways to "get it" when working in, with and around trees, but believe it or not, buying the farm when operating the
chipper is pretty far down on the list. That said, not all chippers are created equal. When I say 'the
chipper", I mean the type I use, which has the aforementioned feed rollers and a rotating drum with 4 knives on it. The drum is located immediately behind the feed rollers. As the knives chip the material, the chips exit through slots on the drum and out the chute.
The other type of modern self-feeding
chipper is known as a "disc style", and uses a heavy vertical disc about 2" thick with (usually) 4 knives on it, oriented at about 45 degrees to the material being chipped. My first
chipper, a Morbark Eager Beaver Model 200, was of this type. An inherent problem with this style of
chipper is the fact that there is a sizable space between the feed rollers and the disc, into which chunks of wood can become lodged. One advantage of this style is that the material is "sliced" a little more efficiently than with a drum because of the angle of the disc.
The "modern" type of "drum"
chipper is vastly different from another type of "drum"
chipper which has no feed rollers, the notorious "chuck-and-duck" style of
chipper. With a chuck-and-duck, the chipping
and feeding is accomplished by the knives. I have never, ever used this type of
chipper, and never, ever will. There is little margin for error with these chippers. A friend's brother was using one many years ago, and one of the crew went completely, 100% through it in the wink of an eye. They took the rest of the day off.
About three years ago, a local tree service was using a
chipper like mine and a worker was pulled into it, losing most of one of his legs. They had defeated the safety bar because they usually fed the
chipper with a machine on land-clearing jobs, and didn't want the inconvenience of having the feed rollers reverse every time the safety bar got bumped. The story goes that the climber jumped from about 30 feet as he saw what was happening, undoubtedly injuring himself in the process. He probably would have been unable to reverse the feed rollers, and I'm guessing he simply shut the machine off. This would have quickly stopped the feed rollers, and perhaps the drum as well if he left the clutch engaged. With the clutch disengaged, the drum takes a good 3 minutes to come to a complete stop.
So let's all think twice before we defeat any safety devices, unless in your good judgment it makes sense to do so. (Safety chain, chain saw nose guards, and table saw blade guards come to mind - YMMV).
The vertical feed rollers exclusive to Vermeer make a lot of sense, but as usual, there are trade-offs. While they do reduce the amount and severity of upward movement of branches as they are being chipped, they can induce violent sideways movement. I have been smashed more than once by such forces (but not once since the tree-bota has been doing most of the feeding), and a fellow tree guy had a worker injured by my same machine. As a crooked limb was being pulled into the machine, it swung violently to the right, pushing the operator into oncoming traffic. He got hit by a car and suffered a broken leg.
If I hear, "gee, that's a lot of money just to take down a tree" one more time, someone else might be going through a
chipper, but you didn't hear that from me.
Lastly, I'm sure you've all heard of the famous "Divorce, Connecticut Style" case of airline pilot Richard Kraft and how he disposed of his wife Helle's body by chipping it up with a rented
chipper. I did a tree job for the public defender who represented him at his second trial, where he was found guilty. (His weapon of choice - a Brush Bandit 250XP, a 12" disc-style
chipper. Fine choice, except for a couple of tooth fragments that crack forensic expert Dr. Henry Lee was able to link to Helle. Case closed.
I now have a strict policy for any chippers that I rent out: your wife has to return it.
***********
Anyway .... let's be careful out there, OK? For those unfamiliar with my "little bell" rule - when that "little bell" goes off, telling you there's just something not quite right about what you're about to do ..... stop, and think if maybe there isn't a better, safer way to do it. I've grown very fond of you guys, and I'd hate to lose any of you.
Here's to a happy, healthy and SAFE New Year,
John