bdhsfz6
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2015
- Messages
- 2,306
- Location
- Northeastern Pennsylvania
- Tractor
- Kubota MX5800 HST & L6060 HSTC Formerly L6060 HST B7100 HST, L2550, L3010 HST, L3430 HST
All the Kubota dealers I've dealt with over the years seem to prefer flat faced hyd. couplers on the 3rd function valves and FEL mounted implements they sell. IMO, flat faced couplers have some advantages. They don't load up with debris, don't leak much oil during connection, are easily cleaned with a rag and don't require protector caps.
They are expensive though and are prone to pressure binding. The pressure must be completely relieved on both sides. For my Kubotas, Relieving the pressure on the tractor side requires lowering the FEL to the ground, shutting down the tractor and working the FEL valve in all four directions while holding the 3rd function valve open. I sometimes have to do this multiple times.
My implements are more of a challenge. Even though the pressure is relieved after disconnecting, it always builds again due to temperature changes, cylinder bleed down or movement of the implement itself. Most of the time, I have to loosen one or both of the hose fittings to bleed the pressure off when connecting again. To me, this is a PIA and defeats the purpose of the leak free coupler design.
Am I missing something here? Do other users of flat faced couplers have similar problems?
I've been thinking of switching to the Pioneer style with pressure check on both sides:
Before I spend considerable $$ to convert two tractors and several implements, I'd like to know if they will be any better. I'd appreciate the opinion of others here.
There is always the option of going to the Pioneer style with no pressure check on the male side like those used on rear remotes. The oil loss is considerable with this type though.
I'm also considering adding a tee in the implement hoses with a valve such as this one to bleed off pressure:
1/4 NPT 5 GPM Prince WFC-4 In-Line Flow Control | Prince Mfg | Brands | www.surpluscenter.com
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
They are expensive though and are prone to pressure binding. The pressure must be completely relieved on both sides. For my Kubotas, Relieving the pressure on the tractor side requires lowering the FEL to the ground, shutting down the tractor and working the FEL valve in all four directions while holding the 3rd function valve open. I sometimes have to do this multiple times.
My implements are more of a challenge. Even though the pressure is relieved after disconnecting, it always builds again due to temperature changes, cylinder bleed down or movement of the implement itself. Most of the time, I have to loosen one or both of the hose fittings to bleed the pressure off when connecting again. To me, this is a PIA and defeats the purpose of the leak free coupler design.
Am I missing something here? Do other users of flat faced couplers have similar problems?
I've been thinking of switching to the Pioneer style with pressure check on both sides:
Before I spend considerable $$ to convert two tractors and several implements, I'd like to know if they will be any better. I'd appreciate the opinion of others here.
There is always the option of going to the Pioneer style with no pressure check on the male side like those used on rear remotes. The oil loss is considerable with this type though.
I'm also considering adding a tee in the implement hoses with a valve such as this one to bleed off pressure:
1/4 NPT 5 GPM Prince WFC-4 In-Line Flow Control | Prince Mfg | Brands | www.surpluscenter.com
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.