turnkey4099 said:
No, they were brought to us by dawn age people trying to explain nature. Apparantly from your post you are against science correcting errors. This is part of the scientific method, exam and correct where needed as new information is found. Religion works backward. Never question or exam and make a corrections only when _forced_ to do so because their stance has become laughable.
Harry K
Inaccurate representation.
There are scientists who regard the Text as true, based upon scientific evidence. The Mt St Helens event provides a very real, recent, studied experiment... That presents great challenges to the assumption of TIME in your view.
If the assumption of TIME is a miscalcultion in your view, all of your facts that involve TIME, are false.
That is a true and very real inconvenient truth.
So, you mock it.
If you truly understand that science can miss something, you would look at all information. Science is knowledge. If you ignore information, you lack knowledge. Thus you negate science.
By your own words, you should be reluctant to take a dogmatic view based solely upon the limited understanding of science you possess, as the current view may be proven false in the future.
That is inconvenient with the direction those of your view want the human race to go. So you mock any science that contradicts your dogma. And you label it religious, because you assume anything connected to religion is automatically false.
There is no science in your approach.
You mock what you don't like and don't understand.
You are dogmatic about what you believe.
Your approach, based upon your belief... Puts you in the category that you seem to hate. You hate that someone would shut out knowledge based upon a preset belief...and that they would refuse to look at information that contradicts their dogma. That, sir, is a description...of yourself.