Egon
Epic Contributor
As stated; who wants to try this.
Attachment not proper.
Attachment not proper.
y
Isn't it the way it is supposed to go?:cool2:
That guy was obviously a professional faller.
Maybe he was a non-OSHA-compliant professional?I disagree. Any professional would be wearing safety gear (chaps and helmet with face shield, at a minimum) and would have rigged down the tree in pieces rather than risk damage to the buildings. Even if you get it to fall perfectly in between the buildings like that guy did, it could still bounce unpredictably and do some decent damage to one of both of the buildings.
I would have made the cut on the back side, away from the notch, above the notch about 2 inches and slanting down toward the notch. That way I wouldn't have to use wedges. I think he was lucky, thats all. I have dropped and watched my brother drop 100's of trees in his tree service. Who has their saw on the side the tree is going to fall? He is just lucky it didn't pinch the saw.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dk0JSn5WDTE
The slanting back-cut thing is not a good method. It has no benefit, it prevents you from using wedges, and makes it unnecessarily difficult to line up the back cut with your hinge. If you're felling trees, there's no reason not to have wedges on your belt. They are great tools. What exactly do you think making the back cut on a slant achieves?? Google it, it's been thoroughly explained why it's not safe.
Regarding this video, I agree with the poster who said that the guy is a professional felling this tree at his home or the home of a friend. No way Joe Schmoe takes this one on and nails it like that.