Gittyup
Elite Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2007
- Messages
- 3,159
- Location
- Mid Atlantic
- Tractor
- Kioti CK25 Shuttle Shift, loaded tires, JD X739
I tested a bunch of headsets for possible integration with a radio handset I had designed, and the tests included Bose and Audio Technical. They were included mostly as a comparative baseline against the industrial types that I was really interested in at the time. So, I tried them both side by side. I couldn't tell any difference in noise cancellation and the Bose were maybe a tiny bit richer in sound quality, but not enough to justify the big price difference. Also, I believe they spec out very nearly identically. Check the reviews, you'll find similar assessments.
The noisebusters were the best at noise cancellation and very comfortable and rugged, but were not the best for audiophile (or even close) music reproduction. For tractor applications, it's hard to really discern high fidelity audio anyway, unless you play it so loud that it defeats the purpose of protecting your eardrums. So, I would recommend the noisebusters as the best, lowest cost option if this is the only application they are used for.
Now, these assessments were not scientific. I did not measure sound levels or anything like that. Just my audible perception to the same kinds of noises: air compressor, circular saw, chain saw, tractor and PTO chipper/shredder combo, and to WMA encoded (128 Kb) rock, blues, country, and jazz music. I also sat next to someone on a plane using bose and I had my audio technicas. Told him my story and asked if I could compare; couldn't tell a difference wrt airplane noise either. He tried it and said basically the same thing.
All of the active noice cancelors seem to do a better job on low frequency noise, like that from motors and such. None of them were really great on the high end (circular saw). After the testing was over, I took the Audio Technicas and a co-worker took the Bose. We are both happy.
The noisebusters were the best at noise cancellation and very comfortable and rugged, but were not the best for audiophile (or even close) music reproduction. For tractor applications, it's hard to really discern high fidelity audio anyway, unless you play it so loud that it defeats the purpose of protecting your eardrums. So, I would recommend the noisebusters as the best, lowest cost option if this is the only application they are used for.
Now, these assessments were not scientific. I did not measure sound levels or anything like that. Just my audible perception to the same kinds of noises: air compressor, circular saw, chain saw, tractor and PTO chipper/shredder combo, and to WMA encoded (128 Kb) rock, blues, country, and jazz music. I also sat next to someone on a plane using bose and I had my audio technicas. Told him my story and asked if I could compare; couldn't tell a difference wrt airplane noise either. He tried it and said basically the same thing.
All of the active noice cancelors seem to do a better job on low frequency noise, like that from motors and such. None of them were really great on the high end (circular saw). After the testing was over, I took the Audio Technicas and a co-worker took the Bose. We are both happy.