Builder
Super Member
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2006
- Messages
- 6,155
- Tractor
- Kubota, AGCO, New Holland LB
The allison is a good tranny but not without its problems. Again, warranties sell cars and truck and they needed to win back the buyers once they had a good powertrain with Isuzu and Allison.
Actually, GM had the same powertrain warranty as Ford years after the DMAX/Ally combination was offered. GM didn't increase warranty coverage to exceed Ford & Dodge until 4-5 years ago.
Now if they could just get the fit and finish, better interiors, and a frame/payload selection that can really compete they will be a serious threat.
That's just your opinion and that's great. I'll take my GMC "fit & finish" over a Superduty any day and that's my opinion. No facts there, just opinions. I hope no one will be offended or think I'm arguementative if I choose to disagree with that point? I know this is Ford territory and I hope I can disagree without upsetting everyone.
GM's frame/payload selection is just fine. Everyone knows Ford trucks' payload advantage isn't really that much. Their trucks weigh 700 lbs more, so their payload advantage is smaller than Ford leads buyers to believe. Everyone also knows that a Ford's payload is boosted way up because of it's higher payload front axle, so unless the weight goes on the front of the truck, the rear axle is limited to not much more than a comparable GM or Dodge. If you take a F-350 with 11,200 lb GVWR compared to a GM with 9,900 you've got a 1,300 lb advantage. Take off 700 lbs because the Ford weighs 700 more and you're down to 500lbs. Take the typical 5,500-6,000 lb Ford front axle comared to a GM 4,900 lb front axle and you know where the rest of the "payload advantage" is.