In short, not under most conditions, but it depends. i.e. what limits your 4x4 in climbing power?
1) Traction?
2) Flotation?
3) Irregular surface & wheel spin?
4) Power? (& related motor efficiency & oil viscosity)
5) Load balance?
Assuming the same size tires and motors, 6x6 will be better only for #1, 2 & 3, worse for 4 and who knows for 5. The math for the flotation case would be 50% lower ground pressure, but whether that increases #1 is going to be surface dependent. e.g. it might make a world of difference on ice, but not much on asphalt. Bear in mind that the extra motors will generate extra hydraulic losses, thereby robbing you of effective HP, since the motors will add 50% more oil leakage to the system.
I thought that the purpose of the PT design was to lower the ground pressure for load transport, but I admit that I am impuning and opining here.
As others have pointed out in this and other threads, it will matter how the motors are plumbed as to what the limiting features are.
For me it is #1 & #3 until the oil gets really warm, and then it is #4. (I have to turn off the draft to get back up the hill, or go up it at an angle.
This time of year, for me it would be #2, and #1 if I would dare take the PT out. These days, the ground is so soft that one can't really walk on it without sinking, so the PT is confined to the barracks for the duration of the wet season. Even the horses are in.
All the best,
Peter
this thread has drifted a bit... At the risk of commenting on topic, I have a few questions about this type of vehicle...
how is a six wheel hydraulic vehicle like this plumbed? Are the three pairs plumbed in parallell?
also, (probably a dumb question), assuming adequate hyd flow, equally sized wheel motors and same size tires, does a six wheeler have fifty percent more climbing power?