Egon
Epic Contributor
jump out of the plane and hope the parachute opens!
That plane may be on the wire system too!:thumbsup::laughing:
jump out of the plane and hope the parachute opens!
That plane may be on the wire system too!:thumbsup::laughing:
Perhaps I'm wrong but I believe they said they were pushing the "start" button but the car would not shut off - little did they or the 911 operator know but the Toyota's require the "start" button to be held down for 3 seconds to shut off the engines.
My question is why don't these cars have a detent maintained panic button like on all my industrial equipment?
Perhaps I'm wrong but I believe they said they were pushing the "start" button but the car would not shut off - little did they or the 911 operator know but the Toyota's require the "start" button to be held down for 3 seconds to shut off the engines.
My question is why don't these cars have a detent maintained panic button like on all my industrial equipment?
Depends on your definition of safe. There are degrees of safety. There is always more room to install yet another air bag. Multi-point seat belts ala NASCAR would help. Rear facing passenger seats would be good too. Even if there were a production car that cost a million bucks due to safety gadgets and exhaustive testing it would not be 100% safe.
At some point we all make a decision that something is safe enough. If you are willing to go back a few decades in automotive engineering sophistication regarding pollution, mileage, and such then a much simpler (safer) propulsion plant can be used.
Pat
Shrug. My simpleton take is this. Toyota, like everyone else, builds cars that are mostly pretty good and pretty safe. But, occasionally, they screw up. This isn't shocking. Even good companies screw up. They all do. Imperfect people building a complex machine is always going to be recipe for flaws. Again, not shocking.
The real question should be simply, did Toyota act responsibly towards its customers in response to the any flaws that may have come to light?