sweettractors
Advertiser
I would go with 70 HP 2 wheel drive with FEL to handle the round bales and the hay roller. Ken Sweet
Here's a link to a prototype NCSU budget for harvesting large round bales that may be useful.
http://www.ag-econ.ncsu.edu/extension/budgets/hayharvest_roundbales_84-2.pdf
Steve
With those numbers I think we paid for all of our equipment with first crop alone. :laughing:
Note that the prototype budget does not include the costs of producing the hay crop; e.g., pro-rated establishment costs, fertilization, weed control, etc.
Steve
Yes I noticed that.
I think the numbers are a bit exaggerated.
Dont know y anyone would use a 4wd in a hay field.:thumbsup:[/QUOT
I should have used the term "MFWA" or "MFWD" and not "4WD"( didn't mean a Stieger!), but it sure makes a loader tractor get around better in low traction situations when you have a bale on the loader. I have a 1070 Case 2WD (108 hp PTO) with loaded rears that I have traction problems with sometimes feeding in the winter. I'll bet 80% of the tractors I see making hay around here are MFWD unless it's an older (pre 80's) tractor.
Kim
Like Ken said 70 hp (pto) and 2wd. Dont know y anyone would use a 4wd in a hay field.:thumbsup:
I don't use anything BUT a MFWD in my hay fields.
IMHO, a 2WD tractor with a FEL is useless, it's "crippled." (try backing up a hill with a 5'x6' round bale on a 2WD 70hp tractor) The MFWD tractor of the same size can safely handle a much bigger load. (look at the specs for just about any tractor and see how much greater the front axle capacity is for the MFWD)