thistlemagnate
Member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2008
- Messages
- 25
> Mace Canute
> Anybody try using dry ice to asphyxiate them in their borrows?
Undoubtedly, though I hear more about using vehicle exhaust. People try just about everything you can imagine. Pushing various liquids and gasses into gopher runs is a fairly popular pastime, but those crafty critters are quite capable of quickly closing the tunnel with dirt and going on about their lives. Some people put in chewed up wads of bubble gum to choke up their little digestive system, and claim it works. Traps can work well if you know more about it than the gophers, but you have to make a career of it. Blowing up the tunnel network means newly arriving gophers have some work to do before they can settle in.
> California
> These mounds around the trees aren't from discing, the mounds are pushed up later by gophers....
> When I backhoe out a dead tree, much of the region that should be roots is gopher burrows instead....
> Something new last year was coyotes digging up gophers....
Wow. That's a beautiful orchard. I can understand why so many gophers want to hang out there. We have some newly planted fruit trees, I have dug around into the tunnels under some of them where the root ball was half chewed up. But didn't realize they could take out a mature tree.
>jlsmith
>Have any of you guys tried using a gophers machine. It runs threw the ground and puts ot poison. Thats what i use on my place.
It's hard to make a living as a farmer, and it would be hard to control gophers economically enough on a large scale without resorting to poison. But poison can also kill any predators to the gophers, such as owls, hawks, badgers, coyotes, puppy dogs, and rattlesnakes. We've got them all on the property and would like to keep it that way. Widespread commercial use of the various poisons is a big part of why we have a garden to grow our vegetables. There are handheld devices to inject a few bits of gopher bait into each tunnel, might take more time than a tractor but use far less.
>charlz
> At least one of the commercial units I looked at had triple flashback arrestors... no doubt much safer but also adds to the cost of the units.
I see flashback arrestors out there at about $50 for a set of two, I might consider investing next time I resort to propane. Propane is less volatile than acetylene, and I find it hard to imagine flashback pushing material back through 25' of rubber hose plus regulators. In normal operation those hoses and tanks have either pure oxygen or pure propane, and neither is flamable by itself. But this is not something I know much about, and an exploding tank would be absolutely catastrophic.
Here's a great little nugget from the dim past of this thread, followed by my rather geeky response:
>charlz 04-30-2007, 07:40 PM
> It is actually all about the oxygen, the mix you are shooting for is about 93% oxygen and the rest is propane.
> I got about 12 shots to a 40cuft bottle of oxygen. I did not do any kind of calculations, mainly just tried different amounts of each.
I'm not sure about that 93% figure, is that by volume? The wikipedia page on stochiometry says we want an air:fuel ratio of 24:1 by volume for propane. Since air is 21% oxygen by volume, the ratio becomes (24*.21):1 or 5.04:1 by volume for oxygen
ropane. That's 100*5.04/(5.04+1) = 83.4% oxygen by volume. It would be interesting to set the torch up to what I found to work well, then measure how long it takes to fill a toy balloon with oxygen. Then do it again for propane.
With oxygen being by far the biggest cost here, I wonder if an oxygen concentrator could be used instead of bottled oxygen?
> Anybody try using dry ice to asphyxiate them in their borrows?
Undoubtedly, though I hear more about using vehicle exhaust. People try just about everything you can imagine. Pushing various liquids and gasses into gopher runs is a fairly popular pastime, but those crafty critters are quite capable of quickly closing the tunnel with dirt and going on about their lives. Some people put in chewed up wads of bubble gum to choke up their little digestive system, and claim it works. Traps can work well if you know more about it than the gophers, but you have to make a career of it. Blowing up the tunnel network means newly arriving gophers have some work to do before they can settle in.
> California
> These mounds around the trees aren't from discing, the mounds are pushed up later by gophers....
> When I backhoe out a dead tree, much of the region that should be roots is gopher burrows instead....
> Something new last year was coyotes digging up gophers....
Wow. That's a beautiful orchard. I can understand why so many gophers want to hang out there. We have some newly planted fruit trees, I have dug around into the tunnels under some of them where the root ball was half chewed up. But didn't realize they could take out a mature tree.
>jlsmith
>Have any of you guys tried using a gophers machine. It runs threw the ground and puts ot poison. Thats what i use on my place.
It's hard to make a living as a farmer, and it would be hard to control gophers economically enough on a large scale without resorting to poison. But poison can also kill any predators to the gophers, such as owls, hawks, badgers, coyotes, puppy dogs, and rattlesnakes. We've got them all on the property and would like to keep it that way. Widespread commercial use of the various poisons is a big part of why we have a garden to grow our vegetables. There are handheld devices to inject a few bits of gopher bait into each tunnel, might take more time than a tractor but use far less.
>charlz
> At least one of the commercial units I looked at had triple flashback arrestors... no doubt much safer but also adds to the cost of the units.
I see flashback arrestors out there at about $50 for a set of two, I might consider investing next time I resort to propane. Propane is less volatile than acetylene, and I find it hard to imagine flashback pushing material back through 25' of rubber hose plus regulators. In normal operation those hoses and tanks have either pure oxygen or pure propane, and neither is flamable by itself. But this is not something I know much about, and an exploding tank would be absolutely catastrophic.
Here's a great little nugget from the dim past of this thread, followed by my rather geeky response:
>charlz 04-30-2007, 07:40 PM
> It is actually all about the oxygen, the mix you are shooting for is about 93% oxygen and the rest is propane.
> I got about 12 shots to a 40cuft bottle of oxygen. I did not do any kind of calculations, mainly just tried different amounts of each.
I'm not sure about that 93% figure, is that by volume? The wikipedia page on stochiometry says we want an air:fuel ratio of 24:1 by volume for propane. Since air is 21% oxygen by volume, the ratio becomes (24*.21):1 or 5.04:1 by volume for oxygen
With oxygen being by far the biggest cost here, I wonder if an oxygen concentrator could be used instead of bottled oxygen?