What is your "Debt Free Date"

grsthegreat · Dec 31, 2011

this thread is driving me nuts..im subscribing out of it.

have fun youall

300UGUY · Dec 31, 2011

grsthegreat said:
this thread is driving me nuts..im subscribing out of it.

have fun youall

I think I will too. Good idea.

Gizmo2 · Dec 31, 2011

lilranch2001 said:
man, I would never have guessed there were this many communists in in TBN
:ashamed:

:laughing: Yeah reading the last few post there are some that need serious medical attention. Not really, I guess they just need another handout. But I'm working as hard as I can. BTW who cares if Eddie's article is years old, if it is, I never saw it and it still holds true for the most part.

EddieWalker · Dec 31, 2011

I just had a breakthrough. We go back and forth, but never get anywhere. Facts are stated, conclusions are drawn and refrences are given to support a position. It's ignored, riduculed or dismissed by those who don't want to hear it.

I posted a joke. A humurous story that explains a theory in simple to understand terms. It was never meant to be take and being real, but shockingly enough, several of you replied that you didn't believe it was real. DUH!!!!!

How could you possibly understand reality when you don't even know when a humurous metaphore is presented?

Eddie

two_bit_score · Jan 1, 2012

Eddie Walker for Congress!

Loren49 · Jan 1, 2012

The spelling is "metaphor" and sometimes it is difficult to tell if you really believe what you post or if you're kidding. Its just not as black and white as you feel. Not a good reason to attack those with whom you disagree.
Your story sure had the appearance of a political attack that you were presenting in that light. It misrepresented our President and his policies. How about something on "debt free date"? Also you were called on a simple repost of statements that have floated around for a while. You also missed the part about more corporate welfare than welfare to the poor.

http://thinkbynumbers.org/blog/gove...fare-statistics-vs-social-welfare-statistics/

"About $59 billion is spent on traditional social welfare programs. $92 billion is spent on corporate subsidies. So, the government spent 50% more on corporate welfare than it did on food stamps and housing assistance in 2006."

Loren

lilranch2001 · Jan 1, 2012

two_bit_score said:
Eddie Walker for Congress!

**** with Congress, How about for Prez?
:thumbsup:

lilranch2001 · Jan 1, 2012

Loren49 said:
The spelling is "metaphor" and sometimes it is difficult to tell if you really believe what you post or if you're kidding. Its just not as black and white as you feel. Not a good reason to attack those with whom you disagree.
Your story sure had the appearance of a political attack that you were presenting in that light. It misrepresented our President and his policies. How about something on "debt free date"? Also you were called on a simple repost of statements that have floated around for a while. You also missed the part about more corporate welfare than welfare to the poor.

Corporate Welfare vs. Social Welfare Statistics

"About $59 billion is spent on traditional social welfare programs. $92 billion is spent on corporate subsidies. So, the government spent 50% more on corporate welfare than it did on food stamps and housing assistance in 2006."

Loren

How can anyone miss-represent Obama, everything he does is behind closed doors, or sealed paperwork

riptides · Jan 1, 2012

EddieWalker said:
I just had a breakthrough. We go back and forth, but never get anywhere. Facts are stated, conclusions are drawn and refrences are given to support a position. It's ignored, riduculed or dismissed by those who don't want to hear it.

I posted a joke. A humurous story that explains a theory in simple to understand terms. It was never meant to be take and being real, but shockingly enough, several of you replied that you didn't believe it was real. DUH!!!!!

How could you possibly understand reality when you don't even know when a humurous metaphore is presented?

Eddie

Well DUH. Perhaps YOU don't explain your position properly, so others have a hard time following your thoughts.

two_bit_score · Jan 1, 2012

lilranch2001 said:
How can anyone miss-represent Obama, everything he does is behind closed doors, or sealed paperwork

Just because something 'has been around awhile' and puts the overall perspective in general terms doesn't mean it doesn't make a valid point.

The complainers have put nothing forward except the presentation without additional comment. That in no way invalidates the observations made in it.