Too bad they discontinued the INST ECON on the DIC.
What that helps one to really comes to terms with is that it is the amount of fuel consumed on starts (lot of fuel, very little distance) that REALLY determines "mileage".
It takes a LOT of downhill "freewheeling" to make up for one stop light.
Contesting merging lanes drinks down fuel too, for what ? 50 ft ?
I have been working on my "driver calm" for quite a while now (-:
but is does seem that I still do a "slightly" harsher take off from a light that I didn't quite make the green on - that sucks down fuel too.
MPG is the reciprocal of rate of fuel consumption.
Basic arithmetic - you a get VERY distorted view of things when you deal with reciprocals, ESPECIALLY if you try to somehow "average" them, whether by actual calculation or intuition.
Not to "get all metric about it", but the European practice of expressing it as fuel per distance is more realistic, e.g. liters per 100 Km.
Yes, the DIC sometimes does apparently lie.
My solution was to measure actuals (including the ODO against 100 miles of highway markers to the nearest 1/10) and figure the correction factor.
I monitored it for a long time, the correction factor has remained constant.
As far as wheel size is concerned - we just had this conversation on 24 inch vs 28 inch tractor rims (R4s vs R1s). You need the tire width and profile to figure it all out - actually the rolling circumference.
Since all internal ratios are indirect these days what you probably want for overall gearing is MPH/K_revs e.g. at 2,000 RPM highways speed is somewhere in the range of 60 to 70 ?
BTW, my D'max seems to get thirsty at much over 2,000 RPM
(subjective)
What that helps one to really comes to terms with is that it is the amount of fuel consumed on starts (lot of fuel, very little distance) that REALLY determines "mileage".
It takes a LOT of downhill "freewheeling" to make up for one stop light.
Contesting merging lanes drinks down fuel too, for what ? 50 ft ?
I have been working on my "driver calm" for quite a while now (-:
but is does seem that I still do a "slightly" harsher take off from a light that I didn't quite make the green on - that sucks down fuel too.
MPG is the reciprocal of rate of fuel consumption.
Basic arithmetic - you a get VERY distorted view of things when you deal with reciprocals, ESPECIALLY if you try to somehow "average" them, whether by actual calculation or intuition.
Not to "get all metric about it", but the European practice of expressing it as fuel per distance is more realistic, e.g. liters per 100 Km.
Yes, the DIC sometimes does apparently lie.
My solution was to measure actuals (including the ODO against 100 miles of highway markers to the nearest 1/10) and figure the correction factor.
I monitored it for a long time, the correction factor has remained constant.
As far as wheel size is concerned - we just had this conversation on 24 inch vs 28 inch tractor rims (R4s vs R1s). You need the tire width and profile to figure it all out - actually the rolling circumference.
Since all internal ratios are indirect these days what you probably want for overall gearing is MPH/K_revs e.g. at 2,000 RPM highways speed is somewhere in the range of 60 to 70 ?
BTW, my D'max seems to get thirsty at much over 2,000 RPM
(subjective)